From: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>
To: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>, Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Avihai Horon <avihaih@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] vfio/iommufd: Implement VFIOIOMMUClass::set_dirty_tracking support
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 09:07:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4aa6309f-d529-4cb6-8ea9-014423d0a1cb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240708143420.16953-7-joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
On 7/8/24 4:34 PM, Joao Martins wrote:
> ioctl(iommufd, IOMMU_HWPT_SET_DIRTY_TRACKING, arg) is the UAPI that
> enables or disables dirty page tracking. It is used if the hwpt
> has been created with dirty tracking supported domain (stored in
> hwpt::flags) and it is called on the whole list of iommu domains
> it is are tracking. On failure it rolls it back.
>
> The checking of hwpt::flags is introduced here as a second user
> and thus consolidate such check into a helper function
> iommufd_hwpt_dirty_tracking().
>
> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
> ---
> include/sysemu/iommufd.h | 3 +++
> backends/iommufd.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++
> hw/vfio/iommufd.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> backends/trace-events | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/sysemu/iommufd.h b/include/sysemu/iommufd.h
> index 35a8cec9780f..1470377f55ba 100644
> --- a/include/sysemu/iommufd.h
> +++ b/include/sysemu/iommufd.h
> @@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ int iommufd_backend_alloc_hwpt(IOMMUFDBackend *be, uint32_t dev_id,
> uint32_t pt_id, uint32_t flags,
> uint32_t data_type, uint32_t data_len,
> void *data_ptr, uint32_t *out_hwpt);
> +int iommufd_backend_set_dirty_tracking(IOMMUFDBackend *be, uint32_t hwpt_id,
> + bool start);
>
> #define TYPE_HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE_IOMMUFD TYPE_HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE "-iommufd"
> +
> #endif
> diff --git a/backends/iommufd.c b/backends/iommufd.c
> index f5f73eaf4a1a..69daabc27473 100644
> --- a/backends/iommufd.c
> +++ b/backends/iommufd.c
> @@ -237,6 +237,26 @@ int iommufd_backend_alloc_hwpt(IOMMUFDBackend *be, uint32_t dev_id,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +int iommufd_backend_set_dirty_tracking(IOMMUFDBackend *be, uint32_t hwpt_id,
> + bool start)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct iommu_hwpt_set_dirty_tracking set_dirty = {
> + .size = sizeof(set_dirty),
> + .hwpt_id = hwpt_id,
> + .flags = !start ? 0 : IOMMU_HWPT_DIRTY_TRACKING_ENABLE,
> + };
> +
> + ret = ioctl(be->fd, IOMMU_HWPT_SET_DIRTY_TRACKING, &set_dirty);
> + trace_iommufd_backend_set_dirty(be->fd, hwpt_id, start, ret);
> + if (ret) {
> + ret = -errno;
> + error_report("IOMMU_HWPT_SET_DIRTY_TRACKING failed: %s",
> + strerror(errno));
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> bool iommufd_backend_get_device_info(IOMMUFDBackend *be, uint32_t devid,
> uint32_t *type, void *data, uint32_t len,
> uint64_t *caps, Error **errp)
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/iommufd.c b/hw/vfio/iommufd.c
> index 1b5b46d28ed6..158a98cb3b12 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/iommufd.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/iommufd.c
> @@ -110,6 +110,48 @@ static void iommufd_cdev_unbind_and_disconnect(VFIODevice *vbasedev)
> iommufd_backend_disconnect(vbasedev->iommufd);
> }
>
> +static bool iommufd_hwpt_dirty_tracking(VFIOIOASHwpt *hwpt)
> +{
> + return hwpt->hwpt_flags & IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_DIRTY_TRACKING;
> +}
> +
> +static int iommufd_set_dirty_page_tracking(const VFIOContainerBase *bcontainer,
> + bool start, Error **errp)
> +{
> + const VFIOIOMMUFDContainer *container =
> + container_of(bcontainer, VFIOIOMMUFDContainer, bcontainer);
> + int ret;
> + VFIOIOASHwpt *hwpt;
> +
> + QLIST_FOREACH(hwpt, &container->hwpt_list, next) {
> + if (!iommufd_hwpt_dirty_tracking(hwpt)) {
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + ret = iommufd_backend_set_dirty_tracking(container->be,
> + hwpt->hwpt_id, start);
> + if (ret) {
> + ret = -errno;
> + error_setg_errno(errp, errno,
> + "Failed to start dirty tracking on hwpt_id %u",
> + hwpt->hwpt_id);
This error looks redundant with the one printed out in the lower backend
version. Couldn't we add an 'Error **' parameter and return a bool ?
Thanks,
C.
> + goto err;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err:
> + QLIST_FOREACH(hwpt, &container->hwpt_list, next) {
> + if (!iommufd_hwpt_dirty_tracking(hwpt)) {
> + continue;
> + }
> + iommufd_backend_set_dirty_tracking(container->be,
> + hwpt->hwpt_id, !start);
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int iommufd_cdev_getfd(const char *sysfs_path, Error **errp)
> {
> ERRP_GUARD();
> @@ -292,7 +334,7 @@ static bool iommufd_cdev_autodomains_get(VFIODevice *vbasedev,
> QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&hwpt->device_list, vbasedev, hwpt_next);
> QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&container->hwpt_list, hwpt, next);
> container->bcontainer.dirty_pages_supported |=
> - (flags & IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_DIRTY_TRACKING);
> + iommufd_hwpt_dirty_tracking(hwpt);
> return true;
> }
>
> @@ -734,6 +776,7 @@ static void vfio_iommu_iommufd_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> vioc->attach_device = iommufd_cdev_attach;
> vioc->detach_device = iommufd_cdev_detach;
> vioc->pci_hot_reset = iommufd_cdev_pci_hot_reset;
> + vioc->set_dirty_page_tracking = iommufd_set_dirty_page_tracking;
> };
>
> static bool hiod_iommufd_vfio_realize(HostIOMMUDevice *hiod, void *opaque,
> diff --git a/backends/trace-events b/backends/trace-events
> index 4d8ac02fe7d6..28aca3b859d4 100644
> --- a/backends/trace-events
> +++ b/backends/trace-events
> @@ -16,3 +16,4 @@ iommufd_backend_unmap_dma(int iommufd, uint32_t ioas, uint64_t iova, uint64_t si
> iommufd_backend_alloc_ioas(int iommufd, uint32_t ioas) " iommufd=%d ioas=%d"
> iommufd_backend_alloc_hwpt(int iommufd, uint32_t dev_id, uint32_t pt_id, uint32_t flags, uint32_t hwpt_type, uint32_t len, uint64_t data_ptr, uint32_t out_hwpt_id, int ret) " iommufd=%d dev_id=%u pt_id=%u flags=0x%x hwpt_type=%u len=%u data_ptr=0x%"PRIx64" out_hwpt=%u (%d)"
> iommufd_backend_free_id(int iommufd, uint32_t id, int ret) " iommufd=%d id=%d (%d)"
> +iommufd_backend_set_dirty(int iommufd, uint32_t hwpt_id, bool start, int ret) " iommufd=%d hwpt=%u enable=%d (%d)"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-09 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-08 14:34 [PATCH v3 00/10] hw/vfio: IOMMUFD Dirty Tracking Joao Martins
2024-07-08 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] vfio/iommufd: Don't fail to realize on IOMMU_GET_HW_INFO failure Joao Martins
2024-07-09 3:43 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-07-09 8:56 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-09 11:45 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-09 11:50 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-10 2:53 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-07-10 9:29 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-10 9:54 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-07-10 9:56 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-08 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] backends/iommufd: Extend iommufd_backend_get_device_info() to fetch HW capabilities Joao Martins
2024-07-09 6:13 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-07-08 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] vfio/iommufd: Return errno in iommufd_cdev_attach_ioas_hwpt() Joao Martins
2024-07-08 15:28 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-07-08 15:32 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-08 16:28 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-09 6:20 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-07-09 8:56 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-08 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] vfio/iommufd: Introduce auto domain creation Joao Martins
2024-07-09 6:26 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-07-09 9:00 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-09 6:50 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-07-09 9:09 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-08 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] vfio/iommufd: Probe and request hwpt dirty tracking capability Joao Martins
2024-07-09 6:28 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-07-09 9:04 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-09 12:47 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-09 16:53 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-08 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] vfio/iommufd: Implement VFIOIOMMUClass::set_dirty_tracking support Joao Martins
2024-07-09 7:07 ` Cédric Le Goater [this message]
2024-07-09 9:13 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-08 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] vfio/iommufd: Implement VFIOIOMMUClass::query_dirty_bitmap support Joao Martins
2024-07-09 7:05 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-07-09 9:13 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-09 12:41 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-08 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] vfio/iommufd: Parse hw_caps and store dirty tracking support Joao Martins
2024-07-08 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] vfio/migration: Don't block migration device dirty tracking is unsupported Joao Martins
2024-07-09 7:02 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-07-09 9:09 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-10 10:38 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-07-10 10:59 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-08 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] vfio/common: Allow disabling device dirty page tracking Joao Martins
2024-07-10 10:42 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-07-10 10:51 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-11 7:41 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] hw/vfio: IOMMUFD Dirty Tracking Cédric Le Goater
2024-07-11 8:33 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-11 10:22 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-07-11 10:44 ` Joao Martins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4aa6309f-d529-4cb6-8ea9-014423d0a1cb@redhat.com \
--to=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=avihaih@nvidia.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).