From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 07/13] qcow2: Discard/zero clusters by byte count
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 17:12:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b8732f2-0bb7-8a23-2ab5-38aeae82574c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170411011718.9152-8-eblake@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2440 bytes --]
On 04/10/2017 08:17 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> Passing a byte offset, but sector count, when we ultimately
> want to operate on cluster granularity, is madness. Clean up
> the external interfaces to take both offset and count as bytes,
> while still keeping the assertion added previously that the
> caller must align the values to a cluster. Then rename things
> to make sure backports don't get confused by changed units:
> instead of qcow2_discard_clusters() and qcow2_zero_clusters(),
> we now have qcow2_cluster_discard() and qcow2_cluster_zeroize().
>
> The internal functions still operate on clusters at a time, and
> return an int for number of cleared clusters; but on an image
> with 2M clusters, a single L2 table holds 256k entries that each
> represent a 2M cluster, totalling well over INT_MAX bytes if we
> ever had a request for that many bytes at once. All our callers
> currently limit themselves to 32-bit bytes (and therefore fewer
> clusters), but by making this function 64-bit clean, we have one
> less place to clean up if we later improve the block layer to
> support 64-bit bytes through all operations (with the block layer
> auto-fragmenting on behalf of more-limited drivers), rather than
> the current state where some interfaces are artificially limited
> to INT_MAX at a time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
>
> +int qcow2_cluster_zeroize(BlockDriverState *bs, uint64_t offset,
> + uint64_t bytes, int flags)
> {
> BDRVQcow2State *s = bs->opaque;
> uint64_t end_offset;
> uint64_t nb_clusters;
> + int64_t cleared;
> int ret;
>
> - end_offset = offset + (nb_sectors << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS);
> + end_offset = offset + bytes;
>
> /* Caller must pass aligned values, except at image end */
> assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(offset, s->cluster_size));
> assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(end_offset, s->cluster_size) ||
> end_offset == bs->total_sectors << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS);
> + assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(bytes, s->cluster_size));
And I promptly botched my rebasing. qemu-iotests 154 caught my mistake
(the whole point of calculating end_offset is because bytes need not be
cluster-aligned if end_offset is at EOF). I'll send the obvious fixup.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-11 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-11 1:17 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.10 v9 00/13] add blkdebug tests Eric Blake
2017-04-11 1:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 01/13] qcow2: Unallocate unmapped zero clusters if no backing file Eric Blake
2017-04-12 9:49 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-04-12 13:32 ` Eric Blake
2017-04-21 18:42 ` Eric Blake
2017-05-11 14:56 ` Eric Blake
2017-05-11 15:18 ` Eric Blake
2017-05-12 16:06 ` Max Reitz
2017-05-12 23:00 ` John Snow
2017-05-15 18:35 ` Max Reitz
2017-04-11 1:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 02/13] iotests: Add test 179 to cover write zeroes with unmap Eric Blake
2017-04-11 1:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 03/13] qemu-io: Switch 'alloc' command to byte-based length Eric Blake
2017-04-11 2:37 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2017-04-11 12:11 ` Eric Blake
2017-04-11 1:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 04/13] qemu-io: Switch 'map' output to byte-based reporting Eric Blake
2017-04-11 1:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 05/13] qcow2: Optimize write zero of unaligned tail cluster Eric Blake
2017-04-11 1:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 06/13] qcow2: Assert that cluster operations are aligned Eric Blake
2017-04-11 1:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 07/13] qcow2: Discard/zero clusters by byte count Eric Blake
2017-04-11 22:12 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2017-04-11 22:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9.5 07/13] fixup! " Eric Blake
2017-04-11 1:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 08/13] blkdebug: Sanity check block layer guarantees Eric Blake
2017-04-11 1:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 09/13] blkdebug: Refactor error injection Eric Blake
2017-04-11 1:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 10/13] blkdebug: Add pass-through write_zero and discard support Eric Blake
2017-04-11 1:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 11/13] blkdebug: Simplify override logic Eric Blake
2017-04-11 1:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 12/13] blkdebug: Add ability to override unmap geometries Eric Blake
2017-04-11 1:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 13/13] tests: Add coverage for recent block geometry fixes Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4b8732f2-0bb7-8a23-2ab5-38aeae82574c@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).