From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Daniel Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, "Maxim Levitsky" <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
libvir-list@redhat.com,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
"Reinoud Zandijk" <reinoud@netbsd.org>,
"Michael Tokarev" <mjt@tls.msk.ru>,
"John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
"Helge Deller" <deller@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Deprecate support for 32-bit x86 and arm hosts
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 23:07:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4bed38c3-ab4f-cd32-05a4-afa090ad8b9a@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230302163106.465559-1-thuth@redhat.com>
On 2/3/23 17:31, Thomas Huth wrote:
> We're struggling quite badly with our CI minutes on the shared
> gitlab runners, so we urgently need to think of ways to cut down
> our supported build and target environments. qemu-system-i386 and
> qemu-system-arm are not really required anymore, since nobody uses
> KVM on the corresponding systems for production anymore, and the
> -x86_64 and -arch64 variants are a proper superset of those binaries.
> So it's time to deprecate them and the corresponding 32-bit host
> environments now.
>
> This is a follow-up patch series from the previous discussion here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20230130114428.1297295-1-thuth@redhat.com/
>
> where people still mentioned that there is still interest in certain
> support for 32-bit host hardware. But as far as I could see, there is
> no real need for 32-bit x86 host support and for system emulation on
> 32-bit arm hosts anymore, so it should be fine if we drop these host
> environments soon (these are also the two architectures that contribute
> the most to the long test times in our CI, so we would benefit a lot by
> dropping those).
It is not clear from your cover that the deprecation only concern system
emulation on these hosts, not user emulation.
I wonder about tools. Apparently they depend on sysemu now. I was
building a 'configure --enable-tools --disable-system' but now it
is empty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-02 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-02 16:31 [PATCH v2 0/6] Deprecate support for 32-bit x86 and arm hosts Thomas Huth
2023-03-02 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate the qemu-system-i386 binary Thomas Huth
2023-03-02 18:05 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 0:49 ` Wilfred Mallawa
2023-03-02 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate 32-bit x86 hosts Thomas Huth
2023-03-02 18:05 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 0:52 ` Wilfred Mallawa
2023-03-02 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds: Drop the i386 jobs Thomas Huth
2023-03-02 18:07 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 0:53 ` Wilfred Mallawa
2023-03-02 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate the qemu-system-arm binary Thomas Huth
2023-03-02 18:07 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-02 22:16 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-03-03 7:36 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-03 0:55 ` Wilfred Mallawa
2023-03-03 11:16 ` Peter Maydell
2023-03-03 11:31 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-03 11:39 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-02 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate 32-bit arm hosts Thomas Huth
2023-03-02 18:09 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 0:57 ` Wilfred Mallawa
2023-03-02 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds: Drop the 32-bit arm system emulation jobs Thomas Huth
2023-03-02 18:10 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-02 21:58 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-03-03 0:57 ` Wilfred Mallawa
2023-03-02 22:07 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2023-03-03 9:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Deprecate support for 32-bit x86 and arm hosts Thomas Huth
2023-03-03 11:09 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-03-03 11:22 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-03 11:57 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-03-03 11:24 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4bed38c3-ab4f-cd32-05a4-afa090ad8b9a@linaro.org \
--to=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=reinoud@netbsd.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).