From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60224) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dgAjS-00022E-1i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 10:16:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dgAjP-0007i7-ER for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 10:16:10 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51098) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dgAjP-0007i2-8k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 10:16:07 -0400 References: <20170811074652.31474-1-david@redhat.com> <20170811074652.31474-2-david@redhat.com> From: David Hildenbrand Message-ID: <4c11bb1e-c25f-ed00-651b-e9f9780215d1@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 16:16:01 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/5] target/s390x: introduce internal.h List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: rth@twiddle.net, Aurelien Jarno , cohuck@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com > By the way, all the other targets that have KVM have a separate header > for things like this: kvm_arm.h, kvm_ppc.h, kvm_mips.h, kvm_i386.h > ... maybe it's time for kvm_s390x.h now? Definitely! > > Thomas > -- Thanks, David