From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/qtest: kill off QEMU with SIGKILL when qtest exits abnormally
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 16:49:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4dc1e95b-e3ed-1605-5e53-b25162c1d932@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0377cbbc-1d6c-67bc-eaef-aec105694088@redhat.com>
On 13/05/2022 16.47, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 13/05/2022 16.37, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>> If a qtest program exits without calling qtest_quit(), then the
>> QEMU emulator process will remain running in the background forever.
>>
>> Unfortunately this scenario is exactly what will happen when a
>> g_assert() check triggers an abort().
>>
>> Prior to switching to use of 'meson test', this problem would
>> cause tap-driver.pl to hang forever. It was waiting for its
>> STDIN to report EOF, but that would never happen due to the
>> ophaned QEMU emulator processes keeping the pipe open forever.
>> Fortunately this doesn't happen with meson, but it is still
>> desirable to not leak QEMU processes when asserts fire.
>>
>> Using the Linux specific prctl(PR_SET_PDEATHSIG) syscall, we
>> can ensure that QEMU gets sent SIGKILL as soon as the controlling
>> qtest exits, despite being daemonized.
>>
>> Note, technically the death signal is sent when the *thread* that
>> called fork() exits. IOW, if you are calling qtest_init() in one
>> thread, letting that thread exit, and then expecting to run
>> qtest_quit() in a different thread, things are not going to work
>> out. Fortunately that is not a scenario that exists in qtests,
>> as pairs of qtest_init and qtest_quit are always called from the
>> same thread.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> tests/qtest/libqtest.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/qtest/libqtest.c b/tests/qtest/libqtest.c
>> index 228357f1ea..553e82e492 100644
>> --- a/tests/qtest/libqtest.c
>> +++ b/tests/qtest/libqtest.c
>> @@ -19,6 +19,9 @@
>> #include <sys/socket.h>
>> #include <sys/wait.h>
>> #include <sys/un.h>
>> +#ifdef __linux__
>> +#include <sys/prctl.h>
>> +#endif /* __linux__ */
>> #include "libqtest.h"
>> #include "libqmp.h"
>> @@ -301,6 +304,21 @@ QTestState *qtest_init_without_qmp_handshake(const
>> char *extra_args)
>> s->expected_status = 0;
>> s->qemu_pid = fork();
>> if (s->qemu_pid == 0) {
>> +#ifdef __linux__
>> + /*
>> + * If the controlling qtest process exits without calling
>> + * the qtest_quit() method, the QEMU processes will get
>> + * orphaned and remain running forever in the background.
>> + *
>> + * Missing qtest_quit() calls are, unfortunately, exactly
>> + * what happen when a g_assert() check triggers abort() in
>> + * a failing test scenario.
>> + *
>> + * This PR_SET_PDEATHSIG setup will ensure QEMU will
>> + * get terminated with SIGKILL.
>> + */
>> + prctl(PR_SET_PDEATHSIG, SIGKILL, 0, 0, 0);
>> +#endif /* __linux__ */
>> if (!g_setenv("QEMU_AUDIO_DRV", "none", true)) {
>> exit(1);
>> }
>
> Would it make sense to install a signal handler for SIGABRT instead and make
> sure that we tear down the QEMU instance there? ... that would then also
> work for other non-Linux operating systems?
Wait, we're doing that already ... why doesn't it work for your case?
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-13 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-13 14:37 [PATCH] tests/qtest: kill off QEMU with SIGKILL when qtest exits abnormally Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-05-13 14:47 ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-13 14:49 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2022-05-13 15:40 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4dc1e95b-e3ed-1605-5e53-b25162c1d932@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).