From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Daniel Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, "Maxim Levitsky" <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
libvir-list@redhat.com,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
"Reinoud Zandijk" <reinoud@netbsd.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate the qemu-system-arm binary
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2023 12:31:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e6512e4-b159-cbe2-5f74-89fab25208e6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8JZqKnSN98PoO684zS1ZADj_KkaWO2QMk3w9uXk2cdMg@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/03/2023 12.16, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 16:31, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> qemu-system-aarch64 is a proper superset of qemu-system-arm,
>> and the latter was mainly still required for 32-bit KVM support.
>> But this 32-bit KVM arm support has been dropped in the Linux
>> kernel a couple of years ago already, so we don't really need
>> qemu-system-arm anymore, thus deprecated it now.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> docs/about/deprecated.rst | 10 ++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
>> index a30aa8dfdf..21ce70b5c9 100644
>> --- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst
>> +++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
>> @@ -45,6 +45,16 @@ run 32-bit guests by selecting a 32-bit CPU model, including KVM support
>> on x86_64 hosts. Thus users are recommended to reconfigure their systems
>> to use the ``qemu-system-x86_64`` binary instead.
>>
>> +``qemu-system-arm`` binary (since 8.0)
>> +''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
>> +
>> +``qemu-system-aarch64`` is a proper superset of ``qemu-system-arm``.
>
> I think this is not quite true -- at the moment if you want
> "every feature we implement, 32-bit" the only way to get
> that is 'qemu-system-arm -cpu max'. The '-cpu max' on
> qemu-system-aarch64 is 64-bit, and we don't implement for TCG
> the "-cpu max,aarch64=off" syntax that we do for KVM that would
> let the user say "no 64-bit support".
Ok ... so what does that mean now? ... can we continue with this patch, e.g.
after rephrasing the text a little bit, or do we need to implement "-cpu
max,aarch64=off" for TCG first?
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-03 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-02 16:31 [PATCH v2 0/6] Deprecate support for 32-bit x86 and arm hosts Thomas Huth
2023-03-02 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate the qemu-system-i386 binary Thomas Huth
2023-03-02 18:05 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 0:49 ` Wilfred Mallawa
2023-03-02 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate 32-bit x86 hosts Thomas Huth
2023-03-02 18:05 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 0:52 ` Wilfred Mallawa
2023-03-02 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds: Drop the i386 jobs Thomas Huth
2023-03-02 18:07 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 0:53 ` Wilfred Mallawa
2023-03-02 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate the qemu-system-arm binary Thomas Huth
2023-03-02 18:07 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-02 22:16 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-03-03 7:36 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-03 0:55 ` Wilfred Mallawa
2023-03-03 11:16 ` Peter Maydell
2023-03-03 11:31 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2023-03-03 11:39 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-02 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate 32-bit arm hosts Thomas Huth
2023-03-02 18:09 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 0:57 ` Wilfred Mallawa
2023-03-02 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds: Drop the 32-bit arm system emulation jobs Thomas Huth
2023-03-02 18:10 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-02 21:58 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-03-03 0:57 ` Wilfred Mallawa
2023-03-02 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Deprecate support for 32-bit x86 and arm hosts Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-03-03 9:48 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-03 11:09 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-03-03 11:22 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-03 11:57 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-03-03 11:24 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4e6512e4-b159-cbe2-5f74-89fab25208e6@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=reinoud@netbsd.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).