Re: [PATCH] Revert series: virtiofsd: Announce submounts to the guest

[Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1135 bytes --]

On 28.10.20 08:55, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 08:13:28PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> This reverts the following commits due to their basis on a bogus
>> linux kernel header update:
> 
> What was the issue? Did the sub-mounts series include kernel header
> changes that haven't landed in Linux yet?

Yes.

The kernel series was applied, however, Miklos fixed some things in the
process, and then Dave applied the virtiofsd series assuming that it
would be OK now that the kernel series is in.

So what could have gone better is e.g.:

(1) I could have marked the virtiofsd series as RFC until I know the
definitive state of the kernel series.

(2) I could have given an explicit NAK to the virtiofsd series once I
noted that I need to write a v2, and not bury that somewhere deep in the
kernel side thread (https://marc.info/?l=fuse-devel&m=160087601428180).

(3) I should have noticed Dave applying the virtiofsd series (Monday
evening) and intervened.  But my inbox full from PTO plus trying to
perhaps get the FUSE export series done for 5.2 led to me just not noticing.

Max


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]