From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB63C43613 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:38:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D311208C3 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:38:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6D311208C3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:33172 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1heInq-0002i8-DT for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 08:38:02 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37731) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1heIls-0001nj-Ko for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 08:36:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1heIlp-0001hU-Gc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 08:36:00 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58640) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1heIlp-0001fi-AD; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 08:35:57 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E53D85541; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:35:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kinshicho (unknown [10.43.2.73]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE61C1001B30; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:35:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4f52c3fff226a31963a5be52ddf0049475b6036c.camel@redhat.com> From: Andrea Bolognani To: David Abdurachmanov , Alistair Francis Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 14:35:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <11f4e4ff6037427f52824ba586f8a330c12d8dfd.camel@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.3 (3.32.3-1.fc30) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:35:55 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-riscv] [RFC v1 0/5] RISC-V: Add firmware loading support and default X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "open list:RISC-V" , Bin Meng , Alistair Francis , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" , Palmer Dabbelt Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 21:43 +0300, David Abdurachmanov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 9:18 PM Alistair Francis wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 1:16 AM Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > > but one question comes to mind: once this is in, we will probably > > > want to have OpenSBI packaged separately in distributions, the same > > > way it already happens for SeaBIOS, SLOF and edk2-based firmwares. > > > > > > Will using either of the formats prevent that from happening? > > > > Both options allow this. > > > > OE-Core already packages OpenSBI by default, Fedora and Debian are > > moving to OpenSBI for RISC-V targets as well. > > > > Any distro that supports the RISC-V toolchain (which is all > > upstreamed) can build OpenSBI. > > Fedora uses OpenSBI for the last 2 or 3 months now. I don't plan to update > BBL builds. OpenSBI packages in Fedora/RISCV isn't finalized, but it does > ship *.elf and *.bin files. Sounds good to me, thanks for confirming! -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization