qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] SCSI: Fail medium writes with proper sense for readonly LUNs
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 08:58:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5003BB94.20603@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1342215040-16128-2-git-send-email-ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>

Il 13/07/2012 23:30, Ronnie Sahlberg ha scritto:
> Add sense code for DATA_PROTECT/WRITE_PROTECTED and return this error
> for any WRITE*/WRITE_VERIFY* calls if the device is readonly=on,
> i.e. write-protected
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>

Applied, thanks!

Paolo

> ---
>  hw/scsi-bus.c  |    5 +++++
>  hw/scsi-disk.c |   16 +++++++++++++---
>  hw/scsi.h      |    2 ++
>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/scsi-bus.c b/hw/scsi-bus.c
> index 5ad1013..6299094 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi-bus.c
> +++ b/hw/scsi-bus.c
> @@ -1172,6 +1172,11 @@ const struct SCSISense sense_code_DEVICE_INTERNAL_RESET = {
>      .key = UNIT_ATTENTION, .asc = 0x29, .ascq = 0x04
>  };
>  
> +/* Data Protection, Write Protected */
> +const struct SCSISense sense_code_WRITE_PROTECTED = {
> +    .key = DATA_PROTECT, .asc = 0x27, .ascq = 0x00
> +};
> +
>  /*
>   * scsi_build_sense
>   *
> diff --git a/hw/scsi-disk.c b/hw/scsi-disk.c
> index 2c2be33..0aca383 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi-disk.c
> +++ b/hw/scsi-disk.c
> @@ -1565,9 +1565,6 @@ static int32_t scsi_send_command(SCSIRequest *req, uint8_t *buf)
>          r->sector = r->req.cmd.lba * (s->qdev.blocksize / 512);
>          r->sector_count = len * (s->qdev.blocksize / 512);
>          break;
> -    case VERIFY_10:
> -    case VERIFY_12:
> -    case VERIFY_16:
>      case WRITE_6:
>      case WRITE_10:
>      case WRITE_12:
> @@ -1575,6 +1572,13 @@ static int32_t scsi_send_command(SCSIRequest *req, uint8_t *buf)
>      case WRITE_VERIFY_10:
>      case WRITE_VERIFY_12:
>      case WRITE_VERIFY_16:
> +        if (bdrv_is_read_only(s->qdev.conf.bs)) {
> +            goto write_protect;
> +        }
> +        /* fallthough */
> +    case VERIFY_10:
> +    case VERIFY_12:
> +    case VERIFY_16:
>          len = r->req.cmd.xfer / s->qdev.blocksize;
>          DPRINTF("Write %s(sector %" PRId64 ", count %d)\n",
>                  (command & 0xe) == 0xe ? "And Verify " : "",
> @@ -1621,6 +1625,9 @@ static int32_t scsi_send_command(SCSIRequest *req, uint8_t *buf)
>          DPRINTF("WRITE SAME() (sector %" PRId64 ", count %d)\n",
>                  r->req.cmd.lba, len);
>  
> +        if (bdrv_is_read_only(s->qdev.conf.bs)) {
> +            goto write_protect;
> +        }
>          if (r->req.cmd.lba > s->qdev.max_lba) {
>              goto illegal_lba;
>          }
> @@ -1651,6 +1658,9 @@ static int32_t scsi_send_command(SCSIRequest *req, uint8_t *buf)
>      illegal_lba:
>          scsi_check_condition(r, SENSE_CODE(LBA_OUT_OF_RANGE));
>          return 0;
> +    write_protect:
> +        scsi_check_condition(r, SENSE_CODE(WRITE_PROTECTED));
> +        return 0;
>      }
>      if (r->sector_count == 0 && r->iov.iov_len == 0) {
>          scsi_req_complete(&r->req, GOOD);
> diff --git a/hw/scsi.h b/hw/scsi.h
> index 76f06d4..94d2962 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi.h
> +++ b/hw/scsi.h
> @@ -202,6 +202,8 @@ extern const struct SCSISense sense_code_MEDIUM_CHANGED;
>  extern const struct SCSISense sense_code_REPORTED_LUNS_CHANGED;
>  /* Unit attention, Device internal reset */
>  extern const struct SCSISense sense_code_DEVICE_INTERNAL_RESET;
> +/* Data Protection, Write Protected */
> +extern const struct SCSISense sense_code_WRITE_PROTECTED;
>  
>  #define SENSE_CODE(x) sense_code_ ## x
>  
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2012-07-16  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-13 21:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] SCSI: Make write commands fail if the device is readonly Ronnie Sahlberg
2012-07-13 21:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] SCSI: Fail medium writes with proper sense for readonly LUNs Ronnie Sahlberg
2012-07-16  6:58   ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5003BB94.20603@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).