From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48058)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1SsCJq-0004Zd-Nb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:28:31 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1SsCJp-0003AK-Kj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:28:30 -0400
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:37818 helo=mx2.suse.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1SsCJp-0003AA-Dm
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:28:29 -0400
Message-ID: <50094EEA.6000801@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:28:26 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <afaerber@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1342377272-32511-1-git-send-email-sw@weilnetz.de>
	<CAFEAcA_2JF74_TwkKdCM69KqPm8L6qmj1TkxJTAXzeuh9pFheA@mail.gmail.com>
	<5005B7F0.6070305@weilnetz.de>
	<CAFEAcA81RGQE5meYmO0mCCBNTkk2igTu9DipDQvhgpqOQxH63Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA81RGQE5meYmO0mCCBNTkk2igTu9DipDQvhgpqOQxH63Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] configure: Replace bash code by
 standard shell code
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Olaf Hering <OHering@suse.com>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Am 17.07.2012 21:19, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 17 July 2012 20:07, Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de> wrote:
>> If the user overrides CFLAGS, I expect that he/she will notice
>> that compilation fails and hopefully find the cause (only
>> expert users should override CFLAGS). Overriding -march=3Di486
>> might be useful to set -march=3Di686.
>>
>> Therefore it was not so obvious to me whether CFLAGS or
>> QEMU_CFLAGS was the better choice.
>=20
> Yes, I had to dig to find out the underlying principle
> distinguishing the two. Having found it I would like us to
> fix this in a way which respects that principle.

I was planning to pick up Olaf's patch doing just that but haven't got
around to it in time for v1.1. Olaf, do you have time to resubmit a
patch to upstream qemu-devel as requested by Peter and me?

Regards,
Andreas

--=20
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC=
rnberg