qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	"patches@linaro.org" <patches@linaro.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/6] kvm: Rename kvm_irqchip_set_irq to kvm_inject_async_irq
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:56:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5010252D.40908@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_73V-5g4Pe_89wmJFBWijvBhWhKAn2rTgeP_NZ--KciQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 2012-07-25 18:41, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 25 July 2012 17:28, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote:
>> On 2012-07-25 18:24, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> ...incidentally I was thinking about maybe moving kvm_irqchip_create()
>>> from being called by kvm_init() to being called by the device
>>> init function for the relevant irqchip (particularly we'll need
>>> to do that if we adopt Avi's suggestion of having a parameter
>>> to KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP to specify a particular kind of irqchip).
>>> But that's more invasive surgery so I didn't want to do it yet.
>>
>> This won't fly as irchip affects the whole orchestra (vcpus & irqchip
>> stubs in user space), at least on x86, and has to be called in the
>> current order. That's also why kernel_irqchip is a machine options, not
>> an option of one of the many device models.
> 
> Yes, one of the things you'd need to do is move actual creation
> of the vcpus (as opposed to the QEMU CPU QOM objects) to rather
> later in the sequence than they are now.

KVM VCPU creation is bound to the QOM object creation phase if we want
hotplugging support.

> 
> Where you have multiple devices which all need to go the same way
> you can put that in the machine model code and then have all the
> devices take an option the machine model sets to say which way
> they go.
> 
> (Oddities in the x86 specific bits of the KVM kernel code ought
> to result in oddities in x86 specific bits of QEMU, not in
> generic bits :-))

I dreamed of this as well before porting in-kernel irqchip support
upstream. ;)

But the point of this service is not that arch-specific in fact: By the
time you have a set of kernel irqchips that cannot reasonably be
instantiated / enabled separately, a single service helps to avoid that
userspace tries to do this mistake at all. Not all archs may have this
requirement, but a generic service needs to address it if it wants to be
generic.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-25 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-25 13:24 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] split out uses of kvm_irqchip_in_kernel() Peter Maydell
2012-07-25 13:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6] kvm: Decouple 'interrupt injection is async' from 'kernel irqchip' Peter Maydell
2012-07-25 15:41   ` Jan Kiszka
2012-07-25 13:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/6] kvm: Rename kvm_irqchip_set_irq to kvm_inject_async_irq Peter Maydell
2012-07-25 15:43   ` Jan Kiszka
2012-07-25 15:47   ` Avi Kivity
2012-07-25 15:53     ` Jan Kiszka
2012-07-25 15:55       ` Avi Kivity
2012-07-25 15:56         ` Peter Maydell
2012-07-25 15:58           ` Jan Kiszka
2012-07-25 16:09             ` Peter Maydell
2012-07-25 16:11               ` Jan Kiszka
2012-07-25 16:18                 ` Peter Maydell
2012-07-25 16:24                   ` Peter Maydell
2012-07-25 16:28                     ` Jan Kiszka
2012-07-25 16:36                       ` Avi Kivity
2012-07-25 16:41                       ` Peter Maydell
2012-07-25 16:56                         ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2012-07-25 16:00           ` Avi Kivity
2012-07-25 15:55     ` Peter Maydell
2012-07-25 16:02       ` Avi Kivity
2012-07-25 13:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/6] kvm: Move kvm_allows_irq0_override() to target-i386 Peter Maydell
2012-07-25 15:44   ` Jan Kiszka
2012-07-25 13:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] kvm: Don't assume irqchip-in-kernel implies irqfds Peter Maydell
2012-07-25 15:47   ` Jan Kiszka
2012-07-25 15:52     ` Peter Maydell
2012-07-25 15:54       ` Jan Kiszka
2012-07-25 13:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] kvm: Don't assume irqchip implies MSI routing via irqfds Peter Maydell
2012-07-25 15:49   ` Jan Kiszka
2012-07-25 13:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] kvm: Add documentation comment for kvm_irqchip_in_kernel() Peter Maydell
2012-07-25 15:40   ` Andreas Färber
2012-07-25 16:47     ` Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5010252D.40908@siemens.com \
    --to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).