From: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] tests/9pfs: Factor out do_fs_version() helper
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:50:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5011369.IO3LVfFpa3@silver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201020174156.229f8008@bahia.lan>
On Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2020 17:41:56 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:34:05 +0200
>
> Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com> wrote:
> > On Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2020 17:11:05 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > fs_version() is a top level test function. Factor out the sugar
> > > to a separate helper instead of hijacking it in other tests.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c b/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
> > > index c15908f27b3d..63f91aaf77e6 100644
> > > --- a/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
> > > +++ b/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
> > > @@ -567,10 +567,8 @@ static void v9fs_rflush(P9Req *req)
> > >
> > > v9fs_req_free(req);
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void fs_version(void *obj, void *data, QGuestAllocator *t_alloc)
> > > +static void do_fs_version(QVirtio9P *v9p)
> > >
> > > {
> > >
> > > - QVirtio9P *v9p = obj;
> > > - alloc = t_alloc;
> > >
> > > const char *version = "9P2000.L";
> > > uint16_t server_len;
> > > char *server_version;
> > >
> > > @@ -585,13 +583,19 @@ static void fs_version(void *obj, void *data,
> > > QGuestAllocator *t_alloc) g_free(server_version);
> > >
> > > }
> >
> > So the naming convention from now on shall be do_fs_*() for non-toplevel
> > functions there. Not that I care too much about the precise prefix, but
> > how
> > about just do_*() for them instead?
>
> I've prepended "do_" to the existing names by pure laziness but I'm
> fine with any prefix or naming convention actually.
>
> So just tell me what you prefer and I'll send a v2.
It's really just more pleasant for the eye to have the prefix a bit shorter.
So use do_*() or any other kind of xx_*() or xxx_*() prefix that comes to your
mind. It will be fine with me.
Thanks Greg!
Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-20 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-20 15:10 [PATCH 0/5] tests/9pfs: Code refactoring Greg Kurz
2020-10-20 15:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] tests/9pfs: Factor out do_fs_version() helper Greg Kurz
2020-10-20 15:34 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-10-20 15:41 ` Greg Kurz
2020-10-20 15:50 ` Christian Schoenebeck [this message]
2020-10-20 15:11 ` [PATCH 2/5] tests/9pfs: Turn fs_readdir_split() into a helper Greg Kurz
2020-10-20 15:11 ` [PATCH 3/5] tests/9pfs: Set alloc in fs_create_dir() Greg Kurz
2020-10-20 15:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] tests/9pfs: Factor out do_fs_attach() helper Greg Kurz
2020-10-20 15:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] tests/9pfs: Turn fs_mkdir() into a helper Greg Kurz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5011369.IO3LVfFpa3@silver \
--to=qemu_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).