From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39158)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1SuQXB-00078w-FD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:03:35 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1SuQX7-0007gB-II
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:03:29 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37719)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1SuQX7-0007fy-AH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:03:25 -0400
Message-ID: <50116A48.1050307@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 18:03:20 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1343249431-9245-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com>
	<87ehnyv7p8.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
In-Reply-To: <87ehnyv7p8.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 00/14]: add printf-like human msg to
	error_set()
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, afaerber@suse.de, Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>

Il 26/07/2012 17:54, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
> Unlike Anthony, I think this is a move in the right direction.

Me too, but I would like to understand how it fits with the
qapi-schema-errors.json.  Do we actually need a schema if the messages
are flat?

Paolo