qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: Khoa Huynh <khoa@us.ibm.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 7/7] qemu-iotests: add 039 qcow2 lazy refcounts test
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 10:07:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50124C4D.6020407@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJSP0QWh9JH8K5_bxJD=gCrTWDABtsB239O30QFOZOLg5QgQ7Q@mail.gmail.com>

Am 27.07.2012 09:56, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Am 25.07.2012 14:21, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
>>> +== Read-only access must still work ==
>>> +read 512/512 bytes at offset 0
>>> +512 bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
>>> +incompatible_features     0x1
>>> +
>>> +== Repairing the image file must succeed ==
>>> +ERROR OFLAG_COPIED: offset=8000000000050000 refcount=0
>>> +Repairing cluster 5 refcount=0 reference=1
>>> +No errors were found on the image.
>>> +incompatible_features     0x0
>>
>> I wonder what happened to the "The following inconsistencies were found
>> and repaired" message. Most likely not a problem with qemu-iotests,
>> though, but something unexpected in qemu-img.
> 
> It's because opening a qcow2 image read/write when the dirty flag is
> set causes a repair.  This accounts for the "Repairing cluster 5 ..."
> message.
> 
> Then qemu-img check -r all calls bdrv_check() on an already repaired
> image file and we get the "No errors were found on the image".

I see. Not exactly how it was intended... Do we need a BDRV_O_CHECK flag
that prevents the automatic repair or should we just live with the
suboptimal output when lazy refcounting is enabled?

Kevin

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-27  8:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-25 12:21 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/7] qcow2: implement lazy refcounts optimization Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-07-25 12:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/7] docs: add dirty bit to qcow2 specification Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-07-25 12:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/7] qcow2: introduce dirty bit Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-07-25 12:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/7] docs: add lazy refcounts bit to qcow2 specification Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-07-26 12:57   ` Kevin Wolf
2012-07-26 15:36     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-07-25 12:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/7] qemu-iotests: ignore qemu-img create lazy_refcounts output Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-07-25 12:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/7] qcow2: implement lazy refcounts Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-07-26 13:15   ` Kevin Wolf
2012-07-25 12:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 6/7] qemu-io: add "abort" command to simulate program crash Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-07-25 12:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 7/7] qemu-iotests: add 039 qcow2 lazy refcounts test Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-07-25 17:54   ` Eric Blake
2012-07-25 22:45     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-07-25 23:41       ` Eric Blake
2012-07-26 13:28   ` Kevin Wolf
2012-07-27  7:56     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-07-27  8:07       ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2012-07-30 10:09         ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50124C4D.6020407@redhat.com \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=khoa@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    --cc=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).