From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51087)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1Svq3i-0004G3-DH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:30:59 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1Svq3d-0003vo-QK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:30:54 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:8238)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1Svq3d-0003uK-89
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:30:49 -0400
Message-ID: <50168C82.2070801@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:30:42 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1343127865-16608-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<1343127865-16608-37-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<5012BC2F.6080607@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <5012BC2F.6080607@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 36/47] host-utils: add ffsl and flsl
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, jcody@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com

Il 27/07/2012 18:05, Eric Blake ha scritto:
>> > +static inline int flsl(long val)
> But what good is flsl (I'm assuming you mean find-last-set, or the
> most-significant set bit), especially since there is no standardized
> fls() and no fls() in host-utils.h?

No idea why I thought that fls existed.

Paolo