From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51770) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Svq6x-0005NX-QR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:34:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Svq6t-0005IJ-Rr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:34:15 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.216.52]:45822) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Svq6t-0005I9-OZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:34:11 -0400 Received: by qabj34 with SMTP id j34so770179qab.4 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:34:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <50168D4F.1040503@acm.org> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 08:34:07 -0500 From: Corey Minyard MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1342724013-1633-1-git-send-email-minyard@acm.org> In-Reply-To: <1342724013-1633-1-git-send-email-minyard@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Third shot at adding IPMI to qemu Reply-To: minyard@acm.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org I haven't heard anything on this. Any comments or movement on this set of patches? Thanks, -corey On 07/19/2012 01:53 PM, minyard@acm.org wrote: > Ok, everything passes through checkpatch without an error now. I have > added some tests to verify basic operation of the device, and I've > hacked in some documentation, though I'm not sure if it's in the proper > location, as I never got a response to my questions about it. > > I would have liked to add tests for the watchdog timer, but there > doesn't appear to be a way to intercept resets or NMIs in the test > framework. > > -corey > >