From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54964) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwDfV-0006pz-88 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:43:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwDfP-0006GH-If for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:43:29 -0400 Message-ID: <5017EEFD.5070503@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:43:09 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1343714097-545-1-git-send-email-sw@weilnetz.de> <5017EE1D.8060908@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <5017EE1D.8060908@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] megasas: Update function megasys_scsi_uninit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Stefan Weil , Alexander Graf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Hannes Reinecke Il 31/07/2012 16:39, Andreas F=E4rber ha scritto: >> > Commit f90c2bcdbc69e41e575f868b984c3e2de8f51bac changed >> > PCIUnregisterFunc, therefore the function prototype >> > needs an update. >> >=20 >> > megasas.o is currently not linked, so this bug was not >> > detected by the buildbots. > Why would megasas be in master but not compiled/linked? Because Anthony objected to how it picks the initiator WWN. Paolo