From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41311) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwF7E-0003lc-9c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:16:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwF78-00088I-97 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:16:12 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:34131 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwF77-00088A-Vc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:16:06 -0400 Message-ID: <501804C0.4040500@suse.de> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 18:16:00 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1887466189.22829081.1343750784007.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1887466189.22829081.1343750784007.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes July 31th List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Igor Mammedov Cc: KVM devel mailing list , Juan Quintela , Eduardo Habkost , Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 31.07.2012 18:06, schrieb Igor Mammedov: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Eduardo Habkost" >> To: "Juan Quintela" , "Anthony Liguori" >> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "KVM devel mailing list" >> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 5:40:14 PM >> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes July 31th >> >> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 04:32:05PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote: >>> - 1.2 plans for CPU model versioning/compatibility (eduardo) >>> (global properties vs QOM vs qdev) >>> how to do it ? configuration file? moving back to the code? >>> different external interface from internal one >> >> Another question: >> >> Anthony, you mentioned that you had a series to convert the CPU to >> be >> actual qdev device objects. Do you have a pointer for it? I couldn't >> find it. > it was http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-06/msg03847.ht= ml > but there is another earlier proposal by Andreas to make CPU as DEVICE = only > for softmmu targets.=20 > So consensus wasn't reached yet. >=20 > If we are to to use global props creating CPU subclasses, we might have= to > make CPU as DEVICE for *-user target as well and pull in qdev deps into= it. We don't version the user emulators, so there's no compatibility properties to set if we follow the machine versioning scheme. I expect Nehalem to resolve to Nehalem-1.2 but there's no strict need to have a Nehalem-1.1 since there's no concept of migration. Anything involving qdev in *-user will not make it in time for 1.2! :) Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC= rnberg