From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][RFC] Add compare subcommand for qemu-img
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 15:23:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50192DBA.1050104@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50192D3F.7010303@redhat.com>
Il 01/08/2012 15:21, Eric Blake ha scritto:
>> > +++ b/qemu-img.c
>> > @@ -96,7 +96,9 @@ static void help(void)
>> > " '-a' applies a snapshot (revert disk to saved state)\n"
>> > " '-c' creates a snapshot\n"
>> > " '-d' deletes a snapshot\n"
>> > - " '-l' lists all snapshots in the given image\n";
>> > + " '-l' lists all snapshots in the given image\n"
>> > + "Parameters to compare subcommand:\n"
>> > + " '-g' Second image format (in case it differs from first image)\n";
> As written, this sounds like:
>
> No -f, no -g => probe both
> -f, no -g => -f applies to both
> no -f, -g => probe first, use -g for second
> -f, -g => use given formats for both
>
> Is that really what you meant, or do we actually get:
>
> -f, no -g => -f applies to first, probe second
>
> I think both interpretations could make sense, but I'd prefer having the
> omission of -g imply probing the second file type regardless of the
> presence or absence of -f, for consistency.
+1
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-01 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1736118218.6697488.1343814369561.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
2012-08-01 10:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][RFC] Add compare subcommand for qemu-img Miroslav Rezanina
2012-08-01 10:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-01 10:44 ` Miroslav Rezanina
2012-08-01 10:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-02 10:06 ` Miroslav Rezanina
2012-08-02 11:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-01 12:22 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-08-01 13:21 ` Eric Blake
2012-08-01 13:23 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-08-02 5:19 ` Miroslav Rezanina
2012-08-03 6:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2][RFC] " Miroslav Rezanina
2012-08-03 15:23 ` Eric Blake
2012-11-20 12:36 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-11-20 13:04 ` Miroslav Rezanina
2012-11-21 9:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] " Miroslav Rezanina
2012-11-22 9:18 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-11-27 8:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] " Miroslav Rezanina
2012-11-30 14:22 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-12-04 11:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5] " Miroslav Rezanina
2012-12-04 15:22 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-12-06 12:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6] " Miroslav Rezanina
2012-12-11 9:16 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-12-11 12:27 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-12-11 13:09 ` Miroslav Rezanina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50192DBA.1050104@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=mrezanin@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).