From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54604) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwZmY-0008Br-Ck for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 10:20:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwZmU-0001hS-AZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 10:20:14 -0400 Message-ID: <50193B12.5000006@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 17:20:02 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1343828147-9446-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <5019379B.5080206@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] exec.c: Remove out of date comment List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, patches@linaro.org On 08/01/2012 05:17 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 1 August 2012 15:05, Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 08/01/2012 04:35 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> Remove an out of date comment: this comment used to be attached to >>> cpu_register_physical_memory_log(), before commit 0f0cb164 accidentally >>> inserted a couple of other functions between the comment and its function. >>> It is in any case obsolete since (a) the function arguments it refers >>> to have been replaced with a single MemoryRegionSection* argument and >>> (b) the inability to handle regions whose offset_within_address_space >>> and offset_within_region aren't equally aligned was fixed as part of >>> the rewrite of this code. >> >> (c) it doesn't use the conventional block comment style. > > I agree that I don't like the aesthetics of this style of comment > but we don't actually mandate a One True Comment Format in HACKING > so I usually try to suppress my preferences in code review :-) Indeed comment style is quite low on the patch rejection scale, which is why I didn't ask for a preliminary patch that fixes the comment style before deleting it in the second one (giving us the option to backport the first patch to qemu 1.1.stable if we get user complaints). -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function