From: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: "Zhang, Chen" <chen.zhang@intel.com>,
"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] colo-compare: return -1 if no packet is queued
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:17:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5019ad5f-439e-ff9e-f67e-41e2ea76b615@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e1841d5119ff4d82ad01586d08ea45ec@intel.com>
On 9/23/20 9:41 AM, Zhang, Chen wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 5:55 PM
>> To: Zhang, Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>; jasowang@redhat.com
>> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] colo-compare: return -1 if no packet is queued
>>
>> Return 0 will trigger a packet comparison
>>
> Yes, we need active trigger a checkpoint to flush all the queued packets here.
Previously, no new checkpoint will be triggered since no new packet is queued though colo_compare_connection() is called.
actually we should send a notify to colo frame immediately, no need to compare them any more in order to less latency.
diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c
index 3a45d64175..23092e4496 100644
--- a/net/colo-compare.c
+++ b/net/colo-compare.c
@@ -285,10 +285,13 @@ static int packet_enqueue(CompareState *s, int mode, Connection **con)
}
if (!ret) {
+ /* queue is too long, do a checkpoint to release all queued packets */
+ colo_compare_inconsistency_notify(s);
trace_colo_compare_drop_packet(colo_mode[mode],
"queue size too big, drop packet");
packet_destroy(pkt, NULL);
pkt = NULL;
+ return -1;
}
*con = conn;
> Otherwise, we should drop all the packet after this time still next checkpoint.
> So, I think original logic is a better choice.
>
> Thanks
> Zhang Chen
>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> net/colo-compare.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c index
>> 3a45d64175..039b515611 100644
>> --- a/net/colo-compare.c
>> +++ b/net/colo-compare.c
>> @@ -289,6 +289,7 @@ static int packet_enqueue(CompareState *s, int
>> mode, Connection **con)
>> "queue size too big, drop packet");
>> packet_destroy(pkt, NULL);
>> pkt = NULL;
>> + return -1;
>> }
>>
>> *con = conn;
>> --
>> 2.28.0
>>
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-23 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-22 9:55 [PATCH 0/3] colo-compare: minor fixes Li Zhijian
2020-09-22 9:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] colo-compare: return -1 if no packet is queued Li Zhijian
2020-09-23 1:41 ` Zhang, Chen
2020-09-23 6:17 ` Li Zhijian [this message]
2020-09-23 6:51 ` Zhang, Chen
2020-09-22 9:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] colo-compare: fix missing compare_seq initialization Li Zhijian
2020-09-23 1:42 ` Zhang, Chen
2020-09-22 9:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] colo-compare: check mark in mutual exclusion Li Zhijian
2020-09-23 1:46 ` Zhang, Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5019ad5f-439e-ff9e-f67e-41e2ea76b615@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=chen.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).