From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59073) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Swx4c-0001VM-70 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:12:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Swx4X-0001eY-T4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:12:26 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54720) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Swx4X-0001e8-LC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:12:21 -0400 Message-ID: <501A98D0.7080408@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:12:16 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1343896676-3178-1-git-send-email-hpoussin@reactos.org> <501A94D0.3080502@redhat.com> <501A983B.30107@reactos.org> In-Reply-To: <501A983B.30107@reactos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] esp: add Tekram DC-390 emulation (PC SCSI adapter) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?SGVydsOpIFBvdXNzaW5lYXU=?= Cc: Blue Swirl , =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Il 02/08/2012 17:09, Herv=C3=A9 Poussineau ha scritto: > Paolo Bonzini a =C3=A9crit : >> Il 02/08/2012 10:37, Herv=C3=A9 Poussineau ha scritto: >>> Difference with AMD PCscsi is that DC-390 contains a EEPROM, >>> and that a romfile is available to add INT13 support. >>> >>> This has been successfully tested on: >>> - MS DOS 6.22 (using DC390 ASPI driver) >>> - MS Windows 98 SE (using DC390 driver) >>> - MS Windows NT 3.1 (using DC390 driver) >>> - MS Windows NT 4.0 (using DC390 driver) >>> - hard disk and cdrom boot >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Herv=C3=A9 Poussineau >> >> I can take this patch in the SCSI tree, but... do we really need two >> models, considering that the PCI id is the same and that (for the >> coolness factor of installing NT 3.1 onto an empty VM) we can just add >> ESP support to SeaBIOS? Does the option ROM not work without the EEPR= OM? >=20 > No, the option ROM requires the EEPROM. Ok, then let's add the EEPROM unconditionally? >> (Regarding ESP support in SeaBIOS, I have an almost working patch; >> however, Windows XP setup fails at "Starting Windows" and I don't have >> any older images nor time to investigate... I attach both the QEMU and >> SeaBIOS changes, feel free to pick them up). >=20 > BTW, ack for your QEMU changes, if you want to put them in your tree... Thanks. I must have an NT 4.0 CD somewhere, just need to find it... :) Paolo