From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53747) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SyLPI-0005BV-Ri for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 07:23:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SyLPH-0008Sk-Qq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 07:23:32 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37827) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SyLPH-0008Sf-Ip for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 07:23:31 -0400 Message-ID: <501FA92D.8070207@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 13:23:25 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1344219522-11873-1-git-send-email-wdongxu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] qemu-img: use QemuOpts instead of QEMUOptionParameter in resize function List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Dong Xu Wang , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 06.08.2012 12:14, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: > On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Dong Xu Wang wrote: >> >> Signed-off-by: Dong Xu Wang >> --- >> v1->v2: fix param leak. >> >> qemu-img.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++----------- >> 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi Thanks, applied to the block branch. (But why do we even use any of the option functions instead of calling strtosz_suffix?) Kevin