From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43985)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1SzACB-0000Ao-2n
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 13:37:25 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1SzACA-0007wK-AO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 13:37:23 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15890)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1SzACA-0007vw-0m
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 13:37:22 -0400
Message-ID: <5022A3CF.5010003@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 19:37:19 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <502283FA.2080506@profihost.ag> <5022912B.2000607@redhat.com>
	<B7A3E239-863D-4A3B-A3CE-EEBFC425E469@profihost.ag>
In-Reply-To: <B7A3E239-863D-4A3B-A3CE-EEBFC425E469@profihost.ag>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-scsi vs. virtio-blk
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Il 08/08/2012 19:12, Stefan Priebe ha scritto:
> Yes cache none. Is there a bugfix for 1.1.1?

It's not fixed in 1.1.1, but it's fixed in git.

Paolo