From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54716) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzNYk-0007x0-2V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 03:53:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzNYj-0007eM-5Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 03:53:34 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54127) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzNYi-0007dz-Tn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 03:53:33 -0400 Message-ID: <50236C78.1060801@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 09:53:28 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <502283FA.2080506@profihost.ag> <5022912B.2000607@redhat.com> <50235527.4090804@profihost.ag> <50236059.7060801@redhat.com> <4A799203-5BFF-4DE9-9B85-459096EBEC22@profihost.ag> <50236484.2090702@redhat.com> <502369C7.7000300@profihost.ag> In-Reply-To: <502369C7.7000300@profihost.ag> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-scsi vs. virtio-blk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Priebe Cc: qemu-devel , Ronnie Sahlberg Il 09/08/2012 09:41, Stefan Priebe ha scritto: > -drive file=iscsi://10.0.255.100/iqn.1986-03.com.sun:02:8a9019a4-4aa3-cd8a-f723-f05db9085ef9/0,if=none,id=drive-scsi1,cache=writethrough,aio=native Are you sure you want cache=writethrough here? Also, please try either updating libiscsi to the latest, or using the kernel iSCSI initiator. This should ensure that the bug is not in libiscsi. Paolo