From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38338) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzTpv-0006Mu-8I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 10:35:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzTpl-0005Xf-Q1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 10:35:43 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54917) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzTpl-0005XX-Gl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 10:35:33 -0400 Message-ID: <5023CAAF.3040000@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:35:27 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <502283FA.2080506@profihost.ag> <5022912B.2000607@redhat.com> <50235527.4090804@profihost.ag> <50236059.7060801@redhat.com> <4A799203-5BFF-4DE9-9B85-459096EBEC22@profihost.ag> <50236484.2090702@redhat.com> <502369C7.7000300@profihost.ag> <50238E2A.1050203@profihost.ag> <5023A83D.9070509@profihost.ag> <5023AAB8.1090703@redhat.com> <5023AD9F.1070207@profihost.ag> <5023B7FD.6060306@redhat.com> <5023BDA6.7090907@profihost.ag> <5023BE37.30106@redhat.com> <5023C083.2030709@profihost.ag> In-Reply-To: <5023C083.2030709@profihost.ag> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-scsi vs. virtio-blk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel , ronnie sahlberg Il 09/08/2012 15:52, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG ha scritto: > > Am 09.08.2012 15:42, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: >> Il 09/08/2012 15:39, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG ha scritto: >>>> scsi-generic would indeed incur some overhead because it does not do >>>> scatter/gather I/O directly, but scsi-hd/scsi-block do not have this >>>> overhead. In any case, that should be visible through the output of >>>> perf if it is significant. >>> >>> Thanks for your help and replies. I'm a little bit lost on all these >>> comments. So what to check / do next? >> >> Try with the deadline scheduler, and run "perf top" in guest/host if the >> problems persist. > > Thanks will do so. Right now i'm getting virtio_net virtio2: output:id 1 > is not a head! > > and then network is down. Please disable vhost, or ensure that you have the patch that Stefan pointed you to. Paolo