From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58281) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T20bB-0004vK-8W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:59:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T20b6-000877-MI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:58:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13070) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T20b6-000871-EY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:58:52 -0400 Message-ID: <502CFC97.7010602@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:58:47 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1345117273-19526-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <1345117273-19526-2-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <20120816103057.675f433b@doriath.home> <87txw3djyc.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> In-Reply-To: <87txw3djyc.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] pc_sysfw: Check for qemu_find_file() failure List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: jordan.l.justen@intel.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, anthony@codemonkey.ws, Luiz Capitulino Am 16.08.2012 15:50, schrieb Markus Armbruster: >> Although I'm not sure it qualifies for hard-freeze... > > I didn't tag my series "for-1.2". I understand that fixes to > not-so-important stuff aren't welcome at this time even when they're > really simple. It's a clear bug fix, easy to understand and low risk, and even rc0 isn't out yet. I think this would still be fine for 1.2. Kevin