From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34197) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T27eB-0001nG-98 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:30:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T27eA-0004BS-ED for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:30:31 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:28705) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T27eA-0004BD-7x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:30:30 -0400 Message-ID: <502D666A.9080906@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:30:18 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20120816134834.GA11974@x1.osrc.amd.com> <1898701172.1847948.1345142715802.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <20120816195324.5356cba0@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20120816195324.5356cba0@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] x86, nops settings result in kernel crash List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alan Cox Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Borislav Petkov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tomas Racek , Alan Cox On 08/16/2012 11:53 AM, Alan Cox wrote: >> >> Yes, if I remove the break statement (introduced by this commit), it works fine. > > What version of qemu is this - do we have qemu bug here I wonder. > Also, is it 32 or 64 bits? -hpa