From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Lieven <pl@dlhnet.de>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm-1.0.1 - unable to exit if vcpu is in infinite loop
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:41:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <502E5800.5060609@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <502E56D3.6060607@siemens.com>
On 2012-08-17 16:36, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-08-17 15:11, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-08-06 17:11, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Peter Lieven <pl@dlhnet.de> wrote:
>>>> i debugged my initial problem further and found out that the problem happens
>>>> to be that
>>>> the main thread is stuck in pause_all_vcpus() on reset or quit commands in
>>>> the monitor
>>>> if one cpu is stuck in the do-while loop kvm_cpu_exec. If I modify the
>>>> condition from while (ret == 0)
>>>> to while ((ret == 0) && !env->stop); it works, but is this the right fix?
>>>> "Quit" command seems to work, but on "Reset" the VM enterns pause state.
>>>
>>> I think I'm hitting something similar. I installed a F17 amd64 guest
>>> (3.5 kernel) but before booting entered the GRUB boot menu edit mode.
>>> The guest seemed unresponsive so I switched to the monitor, which also
>>> froze shortly afterwards. The VNC screen ended up being all black.
>>>
>>> qemu-kvm.git/master 3e4305694fd891b69e4450e59ec4c65420907ede
>>> Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 from Debian testing
>>>
>>> $ qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -m 1024 -smp 2 -drive
>>> if=virtio,cache=none,file=f17.img,aio=native -serial stdio
>>>
>>> (gdb) thread apply all bt
>>>
>>> Thread 3 (Thread 0x7f8008e23700 (LWP 367)):
>>> #0 0x00007f800f891727 in ioctl () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:82
>>> #1 0x00007f80137b92c9 in kvm_vcpu_ioctl
>>> (env=env@entry=0x7f8015b49640, type=type@entry=44672)
>>> at /home/stefanha/qemu-kvm/kvm-all.c:1619
>>> #2 0x00007f80137b93fe in kvm_cpu_exec (env=env@entry=0x7f8015b49640)
>>> at /home/stefanha/qemu-kvm/kvm-all.c:1506
>>> #3 0x00007f8013766f31 in qemu_kvm_cpu_thread_fn (arg=0x7f8015b49640)
>>> at /home/stefanha/qemu-kvm/cpus.c:756
>>> #4 0x00007f800fb4db50 in start_thread (arg=<optimized out>) at
>>> pthread_create.c:304
>>> #5 0x00007f800f8986dd in clone () at
>>> ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:112
>>> #6 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>>>
>>> This vcpu is still executing guest code and I've seen it successfully
>>> dispatching I/O. The problem is it's missing the exit_request...
>>>
>>> Thread 2 (Thread 0x7f8008622700 (LWP 368)):
>>> #0 pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 ()
>>> at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_cond_wait.S:162
>>> #1 0x00007f801372b229 in qemu_cond_wait (cond=<optimized out>,
>>> mutex=mutex@entry=0x7f80144367c0) at qemu-thread-posix.c:113
>>> #2 0x00007f8013766eff in qemu_kvm_wait_io_event (env=<optimized out>)
>>> at /home/stefanha/qemu-kvm/cpus.c:724
>>> #3 qemu_kvm_cpu_thread_fn (arg=0x7f8015b67450) at
>>> /home/stefanha/qemu-kvm/cpus.c:761
>>> #4 0x00007f800fb4db50 in start_thread (arg=<optimized out>) at
>>> pthread_create.c:304
>>> #5 0x00007f800f8986dd in clone () at
>>> ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:112
>>> #6 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>>>
>>> No problems here.
>>>
>>> Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f801347b8c0 (LWP 365)):
>>> #0 pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 ()
>>> at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_cond_wait.S:162
>>> #1 0x00007f801372b229 in qemu_cond_wait (cond=cond@entry=0x7f801402fd80,
>>> mutex=mutex@entry=0x7f80144367c0) at qemu-thread-posix.c:113
>>> #2 0x00007f8013768949 in pause_all_vcpus () at
>>> /home/stefanha/qemu-kvm/cpus.c:962
>>> #3 0x00007f80136028c8 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>,
>>> envp=<optimized out>) at /home/stefanha/qemu-kvm/vl.c:3695
>>>
>>> We're deadlocked in pause_all_vcpus(), waiting for vcpu #0 to pause.
>>> Unfortunately vcpu #0 has ->exit_request=0 although ->stop=1.
>>>
>>> Here are the vcpus:
>>>
>>> (gdb) p first_cpu
>>> $6 = (struct CPUX86State *) 0x7f8015b49640
>>> (gdb) p first_cpu->next_cpu
>>> $7 = (struct CPUX86State *) 0x7f8015b67450
>>> (gdb) p first_cpu->next_cpu->next_cpu
>>> $8 = (struct CPUX86State *) 0x0
>>>
>>> (gdb) p first_cpu->stop
>>> $9 = 1
>>> (gdb) p first_cpu->stopped
>>> $10 = 0
>>> (gdb) p first_cpu->exit_request
>>> $11 = 0
>>
>> CPUState::exit_request is only set on specific synchronous events, see
>> target-i386/kvm.c.
>>
>> More interesting is CPUState::thread_kicked. If it's set, qemu_cpu_kick
>> will skip the kicking via a signal. Maybe there is some race. Let me
>> think about such possibilities again...
>
> diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c
> index e476a3c..30f3228 100644
> --- a/cpus.c
> +++ b/cpus.c
> @@ -726,6 +726,9 @@ static void qemu_kvm_wait_io_event(CPUArchState *env)
> }
>
> qemu_kvm_eat_signals(env);
> + /* Ensure that checking env->stop cannot overtake signal processing so
> + * that we lose the latter without stopping. */
> + smp_rmb();
rmb is nonsense. Should be a plain barrier() - if at all.
> qemu_wait_io_event_common(env);
> }
>
> Can anyone imagine that such a barrier may actually be required? If it
> is currently possible that env->stop is evaluated before we called into
> sigtimedwait in qemu_kvm_eat_signals, then we could actually eat the
> signal without properly processing its reason (stop).
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-17 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4FEC56B2.6050502@dlhnet.de>
[not found] ` <4FEC5B5A.4060302@siemens.com>
[not found] ` <4FEC7214.2020900@dlhnet.de>
[not found] ` <4FEC76A8.6060100@siemens.com>
[not found] ` <4FEC866F.5000402@dlhnet.de>
[not found] ` <4FEC8722.7070301@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <7C6F41F3-D0BC-4753-853D-E68B2AAAAADB@dlhnet.de>
2012-07-01 8:19 ` [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm-1.0.1 - unable to exit if vcpu is in infinite loop Avi Kivity
2012-07-01 19:18 ` Peter Lieven
2012-07-02 7:05 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-07-02 8:12 ` Peter Lieven
2012-08-06 15:11 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-08-17 13:11 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-08-17 14:36 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-08-17 14:41 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2012-08-17 15:04 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-08-19 9:42 ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-21 7:21 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-08-21 8:23 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-08-22 12:52 ` Peter Lieven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=502E5800.5060609@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@dlhnet.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).