From: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug in option parsing
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:58:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <503501B3.6060108@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5034F7AA.7030105@siemens.com>
On 08/22/2012 05:15 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-08-22 17:05, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> while coding the support for Jason's dump-guest-core option I realized
>> there is (probably) a problem with the way QEMU parses additional
>> machine options ('dump-guest-core', 'kvm_shadow_mem' etc.). Running QEMU
>> with option to -machine works ok, but using '-M' (as libvirt does) works
>> only w/o additional options, otherwise it ends in an error (the whole
>> string is probably parsed as a machine name).
>>
>> Is '-M' so obsolete it shouldn't be used at all or is it just an bug? We
>> still use '-M' everywhere I know and '-machine' isn't compatible with
>> older versions and different builds of QEMU.
>>
>> Should I file a bug or do we have to drop '-M' for this situations?
>
> If libvirt uses -M just like -machine, i.e. with more than a machine
> name, that would be a libvirt bug (but that would have been noticed much
> earlier - did you patch something?). QEMU only keeps -M <machine-name>
> around to please existing users that didn't switch yet. It is NOT an
> alias for -machine.
>
There is no option *yet* that libvirt would like to use as an additional
option for machine type, but I'm working on the first one and I've hit this.
So your suggestion would be to use -machine wherever it's possible and
fallback to -M only when -machine is not supported?
Martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-22 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-22 15:05 [Qemu-devel] Bug in option parsing Martin Kletzander
2012-08-22 15:15 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-08-22 15:58 ` Martin Kletzander [this message]
2012-08-22 16:10 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=503501B3.6060108@redhat.com \
--to=mkletzan@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).