From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Cam Macdonell <cam@cs.ualberta.ca>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] MSI-X bug with ivshmem since msix_reset moved to PCI
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:39:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50373DB3.7080700@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120824083640.GD7830@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6136 bytes --]
On 2012-08-24 10:36, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:15:33AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-08-24 10:11, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 07:59:06AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> On 2012-08-24 01:13, Cam Macdonell wrote:
>>>>> Hi Jan,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've bisected a bug in which MSI interrupts are not being delivered to
>>>>> the following patch, where msix_reset was moved in tot he PCI core.
>>>>>
>>>>> commit cbd2d4342b3d42ab33baa99f5b7a23491b5692f2
>>>>> Author: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>>>>> Date: Tue May 15 20:09:56 2012 -0300
>>>>>
>>>>> msi: Invoke msi/msix_reset from PCI core
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no point in pushing this burden to the devices, they tend to
>>>>> forget to call them (like intel-hda, ahci, xhci did). Instead, reset
>>>>> functions are now called from pci_device_reset. They do nothing if
>>>>> MSI/MSI-X is not in use.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been debugging and it seems that when msix_notify() is triggered
>>>>> the second test in the "if" fails
>>>>>
>>>>> /* Send an MSI-X message */
>>>>> void msix_notify(PCIDevice *dev, unsigned vector)
>>>>> {
>>>>> MSIMessage msg;
>>>>>
>>>>> if (vector >= dev->msix_entries_nr || !dev->msix_entry_used[vector])
>>>>> return;
>>>>>
>>>>> …
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> here is some MSI-X debugging statements
>>>>>
>>>>> msix_init
>>>>> IVSHMEM: msix initialized (1 vectors)
>>>>> IVSHMEM: using vector 0
>>>>> IVSHMEM: ivshmem_reset
>>>>> IVSHMEM: using vector 0
>>>>> msix_reset
>>>>> msix_free_irq_entries 0x7fd52d1cea20
>>>>>
>>>>> msix_free_irq_entries() sets dev->msix_entries_nr to 0, so I think it
>>>>> may be the cause.
>>>>
>>>> I suppose you mean it sets the msix_entry_used array to 0.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Shouldn't ivshmem's reset (which reenables the vectors) be triggered
>>>>> by the msix_reset?
>>>>
>>>> Actually, the whole msix vector usage tracking is useless today, this
>>>> just shows its downsides (in the absence of benefits). Megasas is
>>>> affected by this problem as well, virtio not as it calls msix_vector_use
>>>> during the configuration process the guest driver triggers.
>>>>
>>>> Two options:
>>>> - I can send my removal patch for msix_vector_use/unuse that I was
>>>> only planning for 1.3 so far, and we kill this pitfall earlier.
>>>> - We re-add msix_vector_use calls to the affected device models for
>>>> 1.2 and drop them later again for 1.3 when removing usage tracking.
>>>> [The third option to keep the usage tracking is a non-option for me. ;)]
>>>>
>>>> Michael?
>>>
>>> Second option seems more prudent to me. Can you send a patch pls?
>>
>> In fact, it's not as easy. ivshmem already tries to restore the usage
>> flag but fails due to reset handler ordering. I do not see ATM where
>> there is some "enable device" during re-initialization, at least for
>> ivshmem. Haven't checked megasas yet.
>>
>> I tend to think removing is simpler and less risky. Please have a look
>> at the patch I sent earlier.
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>
>
> Actually virtio is the only one that changes vector use
> so the only one that needs to reset it.
>
> I am thinking we should find a way to move vector use
> out from core to virtio-pci.
> But for now something like the below should do the trick.
> Untested unfortunately, will test virtio Sunday
> but would appreciate review and testing reports
> esp with ivshmem etc.
>
> -->
>
> msix: avoid need to use/unuse vectors for most devices
>
> The facility to use/unuse vectors is helpful for virtio
> but little else since everyone just seems to use
> vectors in their init function.
>
> Avoid clearing msix vector use info on reset and load.
> For virtio, clear it explicitly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/hw/msix.c b/hw/msix.c
> index 800fc32..d040cc2 100644
> --- a/hw/msix.c
> +++ b/hw/msix.c
> @@ -340,6 +340,15 @@ static void msix_free_irq_entries(PCIDevice *dev)
> }
> }
>
> +static void msix_clear_all_vectors(PCIDevice *dev)
> +{
> + int vector;
> +
> + for (vector = 0; vector < dev->msix_entries_nr; ++vector) {
> + msix_clr_pending(dev, vector);
> + }
> +}
> +
> /* Clean up resources for the device. */
> void msix_uninit(PCIDevice *dev, MemoryRegion *table_bar, MemoryRegion *pba_bar)
> {
> @@ -394,7 +403,7 @@ void msix_load(PCIDevice *dev, QEMUFile *f)
> return;
> }
>
> - msix_free_irq_entries(dev);
> + msix_clear_all_vectors(dev);
> qemu_get_buffer(f, dev->msix_table, n * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE);
> qemu_get_buffer(f, dev->msix_pba, (n + 7) / 8);
> msix_update_function_masked(dev);
> @@ -440,7 +449,7 @@ void msix_reset(PCIDevice *dev)
> if (!msix_present(dev)) {
> return;
> }
> - msix_free_irq_entries(dev);
> + msix_clear_all_vectors(dev);
> dev->config[dev->msix_cap + MSIX_CONTROL_OFFSET] &=
> ~dev->wmask[dev->msix_cap + MSIX_CONTROL_OFFSET];
> memset(dev->msix_table, 0, dev->msix_entries_nr * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE);
> diff --git a/hw/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio-pci.c
> index 125eded..ca0b204 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio-pci.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio-pci.c
> @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ static int virtio_pci_load_config(void * opaque, QEMUFile *f)
> if (ret) {
> return ret;
> }
> + msix_unuse_all_vectors(&proxy->pci_dev);
> msix_load(&proxy->pci_dev, f);
> if (msix_present(&proxy->pci_dev)) {
> qemu_get_be16s(f, &proxy->vdev->config_vector);
> @@ -246,6 +247,7 @@ void virtio_pci_reset(DeviceState *d)
> VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy = container_of(d, VirtIOPCIProxy, pci_dev.qdev);
> virtio_pci_stop_ioeventfd(proxy);
> virtio_reset(proxy->vdev);
> + msix_unuse_all_vectors(&proxy->pci_dev);
> proxy->flags &= ~VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_BUS_MASTER_BUG;
> }
>
>
This just prolongs the life of a wrong API, but I'm fine for 1.2 if it
helps. However, I will push on removing all this for 1.3.
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-24 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-23 23:13 [Qemu-devel] MSI-X bug with ivshmem since msix_reset moved to PCI Cam Macdonell
2012-08-24 5:59 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-08-24 8:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-24 8:15 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-08-24 8:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-24 8:39 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2012-08-24 9:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50373DB3.7080700@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=cam@cs.ualberta.ca \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).