From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56705) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4u7C-0001z5-88 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:40:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4u7B-0001Zk-7B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:39:58 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-f45.google.com ([74.125.83.45]:33468) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4u7A-0001ZK-T3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:39:57 -0400 Received: by eeke53 with SMTP id e53so735886eek.4 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 06:39:54 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <50378427.2020900@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:39:51 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1345703083-25322-1-git-send-email-mmogilvi_qemu@miniinfo.net> <503714B0.1020404@web.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Running Microport UNIX (ca 1987) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Jan Kiszka , Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Il 24/08/2012 09:19, Peter Maydell ha scritto: >> > >> > Err, does this comply with the -rcX process? Patch 6 alone has been on >> > the list for less than a day. Only now I was able to comment on it, and >> > I would prefer to not have it merged that easily. > Adding a new command line option certainly looks like a new > feature rather than a bug fix to me, and really shouldn't > be going in at this point in the release cycle in my opinion. > I would suggest that these commits should all be reverted. Patches 2 and 4 can stay, maybe 3 too. Patch 1 needs a follow-up that Matthew already posted. Paolo