qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jordi Cucurull Juan <jordi.cucurull@scytl.com>
Cc: yoder1@us.ibm.com, Corey Bryant <coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Is is possible to virtualise or share the TPM?
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:18:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <503F923E.80604@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <503F897F.4000306@scytl.com>

On 08/30/2012 11:40 AM, Jordi Cucurull Juan wrote:
> Do you refer to the patches that add TPM support to the SeaBIOS?

Sorry for the confusion. What I meant is that the patches adding support 
for a private vTPM for each QEMU VM are 'behind' those adding support 
for the passthrough device model. There are SeaBIOS patches as well 
adding support for TPM, but those are different.

>
> If this is the case, this is just a completely virtual TPM without any 
> link with the TPM of the physical machine, right?
>
The SeaBIOS patches don't do that. They just add TPM BIOS support for 
TPM initialization, ACPI tables etc.
To add a completely virtual TPM to QEMU a completely different device 
model is necessary than the one I have recently posted.

    Stefan

> Jordi.
>
>
> On 08/30/2012 04:50 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> On 08/30/2012 10:21 AM, Jordi Cucurull Juan wrote:
>>> Dear Stefan,
>>>
>>> What does it mean that the patches with the VTPM functionality exist 
>>> but they are behind the regular ones? Does it mean that they are not 
>>> currently updated? That they have less priority?
>>
>> It means that in my patch queue they are 'behind' the ones I posted 
>> over the last few months.
>>
>>   Stefan
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Jordi.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/29/2012 02:57 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
>>>> On 08/23/2012 04:05 PM, Corey Bryant wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 08/21/2012 06:31 AM, Jordi Cucurull Juan wrote:
>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> After applying the TPM patches to QEMU, I was wondering if it is
>>>>>> possible to simultaneously use the TPM in more than one virtual 
>>>>>> machine,
>>>>>> i.e. virtualisation of the TPM.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> According to the paper "Stefan Berger, Ramón Cáceres, Kenneth A.
>>>>>> Goldman, Ronald Perez, Reiner Sailer, Leendert van Doorn. vTPM:
>>>>>> Virtualizing the Trusted Platform Module" this seems to be 
>>>>>> possible in
>>>>>> Xen. Is not possible in QEMU?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>> Jordi.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think the pass-through driver supports use by multiple 
>>>>> VMs. Stefan Berger should be able to answer better so I'm adding 
>>>>> him to the thread.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The pass-through driver cannot provide access for multiple VMs to 
>>>> the single hardware TPM on the host. The usage model and the 
>>>> statefulness of the TPM (SRK password, owner password, keys) 
>>>> basically prevent/complicate this. The implementation for Xen was 
>>>> indep. of the Qemu code base today and there we used a software 
>>>> implementation of the TPM that provided a private TPm instance to 
>>>> each VM. I have patches for this for Qemu but due to an IRC chat in 
>>>> Sept. 2011 they are 'behind' the pass-through driver patches.
>>>>
>>>>    Stefan
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2012-08-30 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-21 10:31 [Qemu-devel] Is is possible to virtualise or share the TPM? Jordi Cucurull Juan
2012-08-23 20:05 ` Corey Bryant
2012-08-29 12:57   ` Stefan Berger
2012-08-30 14:21     ` Jordi Cucurull Juan
2012-08-30 14:50       ` Stefan Berger
2012-08-30 15:40         ` Jordi Cucurull Juan
2012-08-30 16:17           ` Stefan Berger
2012-08-30 16:18           ` Stefan Berger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=503F923E.80604@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jordi.cucurull@scytl.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=yoder1@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).