From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55604)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1T8RxK-00018G-OK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 04:24:27 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1T8RxJ-0007M4-Tp
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 04:24:26 -0400
Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]:49486)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1T8RxJ-0007Lu-Mv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 04:24:25 -0400
Received: by pbbjt11 with SMTP id jt11so7654268pbb.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 01:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <50446931.1000509@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 10:24:17 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <503F4F2B.905@gmail.com> <5043DC79.8040408@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5043DC79.8040408@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] boot device order has no effect for virtio-scsi
	devices
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: ching <lsching17@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Il 03/09/2012 00:23, ching ha scritto:
> have anyone tested the boot order of virtio-scsi devices?
> 
> <os>
>     <type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-1.1'>hvm</type>
>     <boot dev='cdrom'/>
>     <boot dev='hd'/>
>     <bootmenu enable='no'/>
>   </os>
> 
> 
> i try to set the boot order with scsi cd-rom first, then scsi harddisk
> 
> but the virtual machine will always boot with first scsi device only (unit='0', the scsi harddisk)
> 
> is it a known problem?

Use the bootindex property of <disk> instead.

Paolo