From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58441) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T8Z3o-0001z6-UO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 11:59:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T8Z3k-0003MM-Pu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 11:59:36 -0400 Message-ID: <5044D3DD.2020904@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:59:25 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <825e653c9cfe9d8e26185917cbe1f1dd7ae299e2.1346048917.git.jan.kiszka@web.de> <503B62F4.9070500@suse.de> <503B64D9.4000708@siemens.com> <503DD705.8020406@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] kvm: i386: Add classic PCI device assignment List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Alexey Kardashevskiy , Jan Kiszka , Marcelo Tosatti , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Alex Williamson , qemu-ppc , =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= On 08/29/2012 11:49 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 29 August 2012 09:47, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2012-08-28 23:26, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> Since this is arch-specific we should probably give the >>> resulting device a more specific name than "pci-assign", >>> which implies that it is (a) ok for any PCI system and >>> (b) not something that will be obsolete in the foreseen >>> future. >> >> The name has to be like this for libvirt compatibility. I can provide it >> as alias, though, calling the device "kvm-pci-assign" by default. Better? > > ...is it likely to ever work for non-x86 PCI devices? It used to work for ia64 before it died. So it's not architecture specific by design. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function