From: Wenchao Xia <xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, stefanha@gmail.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com,
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6] libqblock APIs
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:05:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5045A82D.2010200@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5044B912.7020405@redhat.com>
于 2012-9-3 22:05, Paolo Bonzini 写道:
> Il 03/09/2012 15:56, Eric Blake ha scritto:
>> Exactly how does the *pnum argument work? This interface looks like it
>> isn't fully thought out yet. Either I want to know if a chunk of
>> sectors is allocated (I supply start and length of sectors to check),
>> regardless of how many sectors beyond that point are also allocated
>> (pnum makes no sense);
>
> pnum makes sense if the [start, start+length) range includes both
> allocated and unallocated sectors.
>
>> or I want to know how many sectors are allocated
>> from a given point (I supply start, and the function returns length, so
>> nb_sectors makes no sense).
>
About using byte offset instead of sector, I think sector is better,
because the allocation status is based on sector, all bytes data in a
sector would have the same status.
> This operation could be O(number of blocks in disk) worst case, so it
> makes sense to provide nb_sectors as an upper bound. nb_sectors is
> typically dictated by the size of your buffer.
>
> That said, QEMU's internal bdrv_is_allocated function does have one not
> entirely appealing property: the block at start + *pnum might have the
> same state as the block at start + *pnum - 1, even if *pnum < length.
> We may want to work around this in libqblock, but we could also simply
> document it.
>
> Paolo
>
int bdrv_is_allocated(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
int nb_sectors,int *pnum)
will the issue happen when nb_sectors > *pnum? if so it seems a bug,
because caller is asking a range of sectors's allocation status, and
*pnum did not reflect the real status.
>> Either way, I think you are supplying too
>> many parameters for how I envision checking for allocated sectors.
>
yes, it is a bit confusing, how about:
int qb_check_allocate_status(struct QBroker *broker,
struct QBlockState *qbs,
offset sector_start,
size_t sector_number,
size_t *pnum,
int *status)
user input sector_start and sector_number to ask check it in this range,
following parameter receive the status, return indicate exception.
>
--
Best Regards
Wenchao Xia
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-04 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-03 9:18 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] libqblock, qemu block layer library Wenchao Xia
2012-09-03 9:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6] libqblock APIs Wenchao Xia
2012-09-03 13:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 3:15 ` Wenchao Xia
2012-09-04 6:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 9:05 ` Wenchao Xia
2012-09-10 8:10 ` Wenchao Xia
2012-09-03 13:56 ` Eric Blake
2012-09-03 14:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 7:05 ` Wenchao Xia [this message]
2012-09-04 7:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 6:42 ` Wenchao Xia
2012-09-04 11:35 ` Eric Blake
2012-09-04 13:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-03 19:22 ` Blue Swirl
2012-09-03 9:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/6] libqblock public type defines Wenchao Xia
2012-09-03 13:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 2:00 ` Wenchao Xia
2012-09-03 14:20 ` Eric Blake
2012-09-04 7:10 ` Wenchao Xia
2012-09-04 7:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-03 19:31 ` Blue Swirl
2012-09-04 7:19 ` Wenchao Xia
2012-09-04 7:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 19:22 ` Blue Swirl
2012-09-10 8:22 ` Wenchao Xia
2012-09-03 9:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/6] libqblock error handling Wenchao Xia
2012-09-03 14:22 ` Eric Blake
2012-09-04 7:12 ` Wenchao Xia
2012-09-10 8:20 ` Wenchao Xia
2012-09-03 9:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] libqblock internal used functions Wenchao Xia
2012-09-03 13:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 3:19 ` Wenchao Xia
2012-09-03 14:28 ` Eric Blake
2012-09-03 15:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 7:15 ` Wenchao Xia
2012-09-04 7:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 11:38 ` Eric Blake
2012-09-04 13:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 13:51 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-09-10 8:23 ` Wenchao Xia
2012-09-03 9:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] libqblock test example Wenchao Xia
2012-09-03 19:27 ` Blue Swirl
2012-09-03 9:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] libqblock building system Wenchao Xia
2012-09-03 13:10 ` [Qemu-devel] xbzrle migration cache size advise for high memory changes workload ? Alexandre DERUMIER
2012-09-04 14:05 ` Orit Wasserman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5045A82D.2010200@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).