From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37480)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1T8uWP-0002R4-F6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:54:41 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1T8uWK-0004CF-B1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:54:33 -0400
Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]:47027)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1T8uWK-0004C5-5L
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:54:28 -0400
Received: by pbbjt11 with SMTP id jt11so9540544pbb.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 07:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Richard Henderson <rth7680@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5046161F.4000509@twiddle.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 07:54:23 -0700
From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1346606812.git.blauwirbel@gmail.com>
	<237c62aec9fc11b767eb6e36512dcac2070450d9.1346606812.git.blauwirbel@gmail.com>
	<72FAA35D-8956-4CA8-930E-2D2EF4048571@suse.de>
	<CAAu8pHs4sV=2kvFAaSvizwQt-PMF7O1N6P3aiAStBsfObh-TWg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAu8pHs4sV=2kvFAaSvizwQt-PMF7O1N6P3aiAStBsfObh-TWg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/21] target-s390x: fix style
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, qemu-devel qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 2012-09-03 12:10, Blue Swirl wrote:
> I missed that one. He's rewriting translate.c, while I'm mostly
> touching op_helper.c. I'd expect it would be simpler for Richard to
> rebase on my series, because they only change helper calls but don't
> otherwise touch code. His series rearranges the code heavily and if I
> rebased on that, it would probably make the patch conflicts harder to
> resolve. What do you think?

Do go ahead with the areg0 patches first.


r~