From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34839) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T9vmj-0003Hx-RA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 06:27:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T9vme-0003Nf-0m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 06:27:37 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:62785) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T9vmd-0003NT-Ov for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 06:27:31 -0400 Message-ID: <5049CC0F.5040801@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 12:27:27 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1346959079-8307-1-git-send-email-hpoussin@reactos.org> In-Reply-To: <1346959079-8307-1-git-send-email-hpoussin@reactos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] fdc: fix FD_SR0_SEEK flag + implement VERIFY List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?SGVydsOpIFBvdXNzaW5lYXU=?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 06.09.2012 21:17, schrieb Herv=C3=A9 Poussineau: > Attached patches have 3 goals: > - patches 1-4 fix the NT 3.1 floppy driver problem. > - patches 5-6 implement the VERIFY command > - patches 7-8 are some simple cleanup Any specific reason for resending and reordering my patches? They are already reviewed and applied to block-next, so just posting something on top of it would be easier. Even if my patches were wrong, I think it would be useful to have the fix on top because then you could add a qtest case that shows that my patches were wrong and your changes are correct. Kevin