From: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, euler.robot@huawei.com,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] s390x: fix memleaks in cpu_finalize
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:25:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50512b17-856b-f509-adb6-46015e86e000@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200227120649.50e6ea68.cohuck@redhat.com>
On 2/27/2020 7:06 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:50:50 +0800
> Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> This patch fix memleaks when we call tests/qtest/cpu-plug-test on s390x. The leak stack is as follow:
>>
>> Direct leak of 48 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>> #0 0x7fb43c7cd970 in __interceptor_calloc (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xef970)
>> #1 0x7fb43be2149d in g_malloc0 (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5249d)
>> #2 0x558ba96da716 in timer_new_full /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/include/qemu/timer.h:530
>> #3 0x558ba96da716 in timer_new /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/include/qemu/timer.h:551
>> #4 0x558ba96da716 in timer_new_ns /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/include/qemu/timer.h:569
>> #5 0x558ba96da716 in s390_cpu_initfn /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/target/s390x/cpu.c:285
>> #6 0x558ba9c969ab in object_init_with_type /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/qom/object.c:372
>> #7 0x558ba9c9eb5f in object_initialize_with_type /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/qom/object.c:516
>> #8 0x558ba9c9f053 in object_new_with_type /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/qom/object.c:684
>> #9 0x558ba967ede6 in s390x_new_cpu /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c:64
>> #10 0x558ba99764b3 in hmp_cpu_add /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/hw/core/machine-hmp-cmds.c:57
>> #11 0x558ba9b1c27f in handle_hmp_command /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/monitor/hmp.c:1082
>> #12 0x558ba96c1b02 in qmp_human_monitor_command /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/monitor/misc.c:142
>>
>> Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
>> Cc: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
>> ---
>> v2->v1:
>> - Similarly to other cleanups, move timer_new into realize(Suggested by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé)
>> v3->v2:
>> - Also do the timer_free in unrealize, it seems more balance.
>> ---
>> target/s390x/cpu.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c
>> index cf84d307c6..cc63c9db22 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.c
>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c
>> @@ -170,7 +170,12 @@ static void s390_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>> S390CPUClass *scc = S390_CPU_GET_CLASS(dev);
>> #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
>> S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(dev);
>> + cpu->env.tod_timer =
>> + timer_new_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL, s390x_tod_timer, cpu);
>> + cpu->env.cpu_timer =
>> + timer_new_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL, s390x_cpu_timer, cpu);
>> #endif
>
> It does not seem you addressed the comments I had last time, namely
> - memory leak on error (we do not go through unrealize if the device
> was never completely realized)
> - coding style (initialization in middle of declaration section)
I am sorry, I misread the peter's reply and miss the codeing style too.
Apologies for you. I will change it.
Thanks.
>
>> +
>> Error *err = NULL;
>>
>> /* the model has to be realized before qemu_init_vcpu() due to kvm */
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-27 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-27 2:50 [PATCH v3 0/6] delay timer_new from init to realize to fix memleaks Pan Nengyuan
2020-02-27 2:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] s390x: fix memleaks in cpu_finalize Pan Nengyuan
2020-02-27 8:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-27 8:55 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-27 9:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-27 8:58 ` Pan Nengyuan
2020-02-27 9:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-27 9:15 ` Pan Nengyuan
2020-02-27 11:06 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-27 11:25 ` Pan Nengyuan [this message]
2020-03-02 14:34 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-03-03 1:39 ` Pan Nengyuan
2020-02-27 2:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] hw/arm/pxa2xx: move timer_new from init() into realize() to avoid memleaks Pan Nengyuan
2020-02-27 2:50 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] hw/arm/spitz: " Pan Nengyuan
2020-02-27 2:50 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] hw/arm/strongarm: " Pan Nengyuan
2020-02-27 2:50 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] hw/misc/mos6522: " Pan Nengyuan
2020-03-02 13:21 ` Peter Maydell
2020-03-02 19:17 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2020-03-03 1:36 ` Pan Nengyuan
2020-03-04 20:40 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2020-02-27 2:50 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] hw/timer/cadence_ttc: " Pan Nengyuan
2020-02-27 6:33 ` Alistair Francis
2020-03-02 13:21 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] delay timer_new from init to realize to fix memleaks Peter Maydell
2020-03-03 1:26 ` Pan Nengyuan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50512b17-856b-f509-adb6-46015e86e000@huawei.com \
--to=pannengyuan@huawei.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=euler.robot@huawei.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).