From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40358) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCEuU-0008EC-E4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:17:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCEuT-0008DO-FF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:17:10 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:29674) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCEuS-0008DB-Tb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:17:09 -0400 Message-ID: <5052312C.4040203@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:17:00 -0400 From: Jeff Cody MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <925addfddafe2c9c0c35a55d3de954ad1d0b0a5f.1347548248.git.jcody@redhat.com> <50520461.6090001@redhat.com> <50521196.9010208@redhat.com> <50522BB9.2070408@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <50522BB9.2070408@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 09/16] block: raw image file reopen Reply-To: jcody@redhat.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, supriyak@linux.vnet.ibm.com, eblake@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@gmail.com On 09/13/2012 02:53 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 13/09/2012 19:02, Jeff Cody ha scritto: >> I kept the stubs for them for completeness, >> however (I can remove them if that causes heartburn for others). > > The point of making them optional is to avoid stubs, isn't it? ;) > > Paolo > Fair point - consider them removed for v3. :)