From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57007)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1TCQkj-0001Ph-Vx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 03:55:59 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1TCQkf-0008Uc-CH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 03:55:53 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60635)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1TCQke-0008UR-L5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 03:55:48 -0400
Message-ID: <5052E2FE.5020908@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 09:55:42 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1347548248.git.jcody@redhat.com>
	<01df3140216ac0398bfb3a295c553c42cdf31e5b.1347548248.git.jcody@redhat.com>
	<5052060A.5010304@redhat.com> <5052DC5C.4080907@redhat.com>
	<5052E1B2.2080304@redhat.com> <5052E2E2.5040307@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <5052E2E2.5040307@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 06/16] block: do not parse
 BDRV_O_CACHE_WB in raw block drivers
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: supriyak@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>, eblake@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@gmail.com

Il 14/09/2012 09:55, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
>> Either we go and touch all the protocols
>> > (effectively removing BDRV_O_CACHE_WB from the BlockDriver
>> > specification), or treating raw-{posix,win32} specially means we leave
>> > bugs everywhere else.
> Yes, touch all protocols and fix them. BDRV_O_CACHE_WB should be for
> block.c only.

That's also fine, of course.

Paolo