From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-i386 vs qemu-system-x86_64 ?
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:12:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5053031B.8020902@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5053010E.1000103@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
On 2012-09-14 12:03, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 14.09.2012 14:00, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> []
>> The major difference in qemu-system-i386 vs. qemu-system-x86_64 is on
>> the TCG side: We measured noticeable performance benefits when running
>> 32/16 bit OSes against qemu-system-i386 vs. using qemu-system-x86_64. I
>> don't have numbers at hand, but colleagues decided to use the 32-bit
>> version for that reason (when no KVM is available).
>
> Interesting. Maybe someone should look at the difference on TCG side
> and merge interesting bits from i386 to x86_64... :)
I suppose the difference - for our use cases at least - lies in the
different register and address sizes. Maybe there is room for more
runtime optimizations, we never looked in that details as -i386 still
works fine. And, if you are on 32-bit host (see below) - but we aren't,
qemu-system-x86_64 hurts even more.
>
> The thing is: x86_64 becomes the only x86 platform these days, or at
> least the MAIN platform.
I know, and I'm telling everyone. Still, too many crazy people keep on
installing 32-bit distros or even 32-bit kernels. Maybe x64-32 will
improve this.
>
> Thank you for the clarification -- very useful information indeed!
>
> /mjt
>
You are welcome.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-14 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-14 7:39 [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-i386 vs qemu-system-x86_64 ? Michael Tokarev
2012-09-14 9:33 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-09-14 9:39 ` Michael Tokarev
2012-09-14 10:00 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-09-14 10:03 ` Michael Tokarev
2012-09-14 10:12 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2012-09-14 10:20 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-09-14 10:32 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-09-14 10:39 ` Peter Maydell
2012-09-14 12:24 ` Aurelien Jarno
2012-09-14 19:29 ` Blue Swirl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5053031B.8020902@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).