From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56267)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pl@dlhnet.de>) id 1TDCGY-0005e8-Lm
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 06:39:55 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pl@dlhnet.de>) id 1TDCGX-0007qm-PQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 06:39:54 -0400
Received: from ssl.dlhnet.de ([91.198.192.8]:57465 helo=ssl.dlh.net)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <pl@dlhnet.de>)
	id 1TDCGX-0007qi-Iv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 06:39:53 -0400
Message-ID: <5055AC78.8040606@dlhnet.de>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 12:39:52 +0200
From: Peter Lieven <pl@dlhnet.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Block Migration and xbzrle
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>

Hi,

I remember that this was broken some time ago and currently with 
qemu-kvm 1.2.0 I am still not able to use
block migration plus xbzrle. The migration fails if both are used 
together. XBZRLE without block migration works.

Can someone please advise what is the current expected behaviour?

Thanks,
Peter