From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33518) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TDffb-0002fW-8f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:03:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TDffR-0006Iv-JS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:03:43 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:7107) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TDffR-0006GK-BZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:03:33 -0400 Message-ID: <505765F9.1020302@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:03:37 +0300 From: Orit Wasserman MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5055AC78.8040606@dlhnet.de> In-Reply-To: <5055AC78.8040606@dlhnet.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Block Migration and xbzrle List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Lieven Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" On 09/16/2012 01:39 PM, Peter Lieven wrote: > Hi, > > I remember that this was broken some time ago and currently with qemu-kvm 1.2.0 I am still not able to use > block migration plus xbzrle. The migration fails if both are used together. XBZRLE without block migration works. > > Can someone please advise what is the current expected behaviour? XBZRLE only work on guest memory so it shouldn't be effected by block migration. What is the error you are getting? What command line ? Regards, Orit > > Thanks, > Peter > >