From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40313) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TDjEn-00065Q-55 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:52:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TDjEl-0004vE-OG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:52:17 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.216.52]:45852) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TDjEl-0004v8-KN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:52:15 -0400 Received: by qabg14 with SMTP id g14so1926409qab.4 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:52:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <50579B8C.5080208@twiddle.net> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:52:12 -0700 From: Richard Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1347895732-22212-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> <1347895732-22212-5-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> <50574A07.5030009@suse.de> <5057586A.6010809@twiddle.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/13] tcg-sparc: Assume v9 cpu always, i.e. force v8plus in 32-bit mode. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 09/17/2012 12:25 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: > Would it make sense to break up tcg/sparc into tcg/sparc32 and > tcg/sparc64? That way it would be possible to give Sparc32 a chance of > getting fixed. But I wouldn't object removal either. IMO someone would have to actively step forward to maintain sparcv8 before we should even consider keeping it. It has been actively broken for so long and no one has complained. r~