From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48674) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE7xN-0006IR-2t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:15:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE7xM-0002YE-Aa for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:15:57 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.213.45]:57676) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE7xM-0002Y7-6F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:15:56 -0400 Received: by yhpp34 with SMTP id p34so135718yhp.4 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:15:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <50590EB9.70606@twiddle.net> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:15:53 -0700 From: Richard Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1347224784-19472-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> <1347224784-19472-48-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> <5058DE58.9080006@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <5058DE58.9080006@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 047/126] target-s390: Convert LOAD, STORE MULTIPLE List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 09/18/2012 01:49 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > I don't have a good answer here, but how do we guarantee that we're > not overrunning the tcg inst buffer? Dunno. Not a new problem though, since the old code does the same thing. r~