From: Peter Lieven <pl@dlhnet.de>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Block Migration Assertion in qemu-kvm 1.2.0
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 07:49:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50595CFE.7050208@dlhnet.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50584D84.2080802@redhat.com>
On 09/18/12 12:31, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 18.09.2012 12:28, schrieb Peter Lieven:
>> On 09/17/12 22:12, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>> On 09/17/12 10:41, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>>> Am 16.09.2012 12:13, schrieb Peter Lieven:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> when trying to block migrate a VM from one node to another, the source
>>>>> VM crashed with the following assertion:
>>>>> block.c:3829: bdrv_set_in_use: Assertion `bs->in_use != in_use' failed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this sth already addresses/known?
>>>> Not that I'm aware of, at least.
>>>>
>>>> Block migration doesn't seem to check whether the device is already in
>>>> use, maybe this is the problem. Not sure why it would be in use, though,
>>>> and in my quick test it didn't crash.
>>>>
>>>> So we need some more information: What's you command line, did you do
>>>> anything specific in the monitor with block devices, what does the
>>>> stacktrace look like, etc.?
>>> kevin, it seems that i can very easily force a crash if I cancel a
>>> running block migration.
>> if I understand correctly what happens there are aio callbacks coming in
>> after
>> blk_mig_cleanup() has been called.
>>
>> what is the proper way to detect this in blk_mig_read_cb()?
> You could try this, it doesn't detect the situation in
> blk_mig_read_cb(), but ensures that all callbacks happen before we do
> the actual cleanup (completely untested):
after testing it for half an hour i can say, it seems to fix the problem.
no segfaults and also no other assertions.
while searching I have seen that the queses blk_list and bmds_list are
initialized at
qemu startup. wouldn't it be better to initialize them at init_blk_migration
or at least check that they are really empty? i have also seen that
prev_time_offset
is not initialized.
thank you,
peter
sth like this:
--- qemu-kvm-1.2.0/block-migration.c.orig 2012-09-17
21:14:44.458429855 +0200
+++ qemu-kvm-1.2.0/block-migration.c 2012-09-17 21:15:40.599736962 +0200
@@ -311,8 +311,12 @@ static void init_blk_migration(QEMUFile
block_mig_state.prev_progress = -1;
block_mig_state.bulk_completed = 0;
block_mig_state.total_time = 0;
+ block_mig_state.prev_time_offset = 0;
block_mig_state.reads = 0;
+ QSIMPLEQ_INIT(&block_mig_state.bmds_list);
+ QSIMPLEQ_INIT(&block_mig_state.blk_list);
+
bdrv_iterate(init_blk_migration_it, NULL);
}
@@ -760,9 +764,6 @@ SaveVMHandlers savevm_block_handlers = {
void blk_mig_init(void)
{
- QSIMPLEQ_INIT(&block_mig_state.bmds_list);
- QSIMPLEQ_INIT(&block_mig_state.blk_list);
-
register_savevm_live(NULL, "block", 0, 1, &savevm_block_handlers,
&block_mig_state);
}
> diff --git a/block-migration.c b/block-migration.c
> index 7def8ab..ed93301 100644
> --- a/block-migration.c
> +++ b/block-migration.c
> @@ -519,6 +519,8 @@ static void blk_mig_cleanup(void)
> BlkMigDevState *bmds;
> BlkMigBlock *blk;
>
> + bdrv_drain_all();
> +
> set_dirty_tracking(0);
>
> while ((bmds = QSIMPLEQ_FIRST(&block_mig_state.bmds_list)) != NULL) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-19 5:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-16 10:13 [Qemu-devel] Block Migration Assertion in qemu-kvm 1.2.0 Peter Lieven
2012-09-17 8:41 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-09-17 14:35 ` Peter Lieven
2012-09-17 20:12 ` Peter Lieven
2012-09-18 10:28 ` Peter Lieven
2012-09-18 10:31 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-09-19 5:49 ` Peter Lieven [this message]
2012-09-25 14:00 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-09-17 20:20 ` Peter Lieven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50595CFE.7050208@dlhnet.de \
--to=pl@dlhnet.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).