From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54499) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TELEz-0002t2-Oq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:27:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TELEt-0002CH-Oi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:27:01 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]:32779) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TELEt-0002Bc-JU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:26:55 -0400 Received: by pbbrp12 with SMTP id rp12so2578467pbb.4 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 07:26:54 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <5059D62C.4030508@twiddle.net> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 07:26:52 -0700 From: Richard Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1347978240-20260-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> <20120918211141.GA20705@ohm.aurel32.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] tcg: movcond List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: malc Cc: Blue Swirl , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Aurelien Jarno On 09/19/2012 06:03 AM, malc wrote: > (i.e. where to get the alpha image from how to run it exactly) The easiest alpha test is to just run the rom shipped with qemu, i.e. no arguments. That will certainly be good enough to test conditional move and conditional branch insns. > P.S. The only thing i've noticed is somewhat unusual naming convention > in the README, nothing else uses cN and vN naming of arguments, > perhaps sticking to t0, t1, t2, t3 is better to avoid confusion? I wanted better to highlight that the first two inputs are the comparison inputs, and the second two inputs are the "values" to be moved. r~