From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43178) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TENfM-0005Ts-Ef for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:02:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TENfI-00011w-H9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:02:24 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]:49229) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TENfI-00011T-Az for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:02:20 -0400 Received: by pbbrp12 with SMTP id rp12so2907580pbb.4 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:02:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <5059FA99.6010101@twiddle.net> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:02:17 -0700 From: Richard Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5059FA36.1080301@twiddle.net> In-Reply-To: <5059FA36.1080301@twiddle.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Shifts, ppc[64], xtensa List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Max Filippov , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Aurelien Jarno On 09/19/2012 10:00 AM, Richard Henderson wrote: > And as far as the referenced change, that has to do with "real" > branches, i.e. INDEX_op_brcond et at. Which *do* need to be > protected against retranslation. But INDEX_op_goto_tb is a > different case. Err, well, that patch *does* change INDEX_op_goto_tb, but I think that's wrong. It should have only changed INDEX_op_brcond. r~