From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39454) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TEctz-0008PY-1H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 05:18:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TEcts-0000Z2-Vk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 05:18:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59491) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TEcts-0000Ys-ND for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 05:18:24 -0400 Message-ID: <505ADF53.7030306@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:18:11 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <50587258.9090303@siemens.com> <20120919133720.GB22659@snow> <5059D26E.2050808@siemens.com> <5059DAC4.9020907@siemens.com> <505AC257.3080000@siemens.com> <20120920071912.GX20907@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20120920071912.GX20907@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Will the ELI incorporated in theKVM? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gleb Natapov Cc: Nadav Har'El , Jan Kiszka , GaoYi , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Michael D Day , Muli Ben-Yehuda , Nadav Amit , Abel Gordon On 09/20/2012 10:19 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: >> Again: If you think the feature is non-invasive, send patches against >> the kernel and QEMU. >> > And explain why it is better than what modern HW provides. If it's non-invasive (and easily maintainable), it doesn't have to be better. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function